Skip to content

· Public charity

Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates Inc

To assist at risk students to graduate from high school and successfully transition to work or further education.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
67
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$16MHuman Services$160k
02FY2025 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k45 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS$275,000
FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$225,000
SCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$145,000
WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$120,000
FLOYD COUNTY SCHOOLS$100,000
ELLIOTT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION$80,000
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOLS$80,000
BEREA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$80,000
BARBOURVILLE INDEPENDENT SHOOLS$80,000
CLAY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$80,000
MENIFEE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION$80,000
WOLFE COUNTY SCHOOLS$80,000
DAVIESS COUNTY PUBLIC SHOOLS$80,000
GARRARD COUNTY SCHOOLS$80,000
JOHNSON COUNTY SCHOOLS$80,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%SCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $160k → 8%DAVIESS COUNTY PUBLIC SHOOLS: $80k → 13%FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $303k → 15%JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $147k → 15%CLARK COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 15%BEREA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $80k → 16%GARRARD COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 16%WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $133k → 18%FLEMING COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 21%MENIFEE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $80k → 23%PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $280k → 25%JOHNSON COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 26%ELLIOTT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $80k → 27%WOLFE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 32%BARBOURVILLE INDEPENDENT SHOOLS: $80k → 33%CLAY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $120k → 35%MARTIN COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 36%SCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $155k → 8%FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $225k → 15%JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $117k → 15%CLARK COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 15%GARRARD COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 16%WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $120k → 18%FLEMING COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 21%MENIFEE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $80k → 23%PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $275k → 25%JOHNSON COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 26%CLAY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100k → 35%MARTIN COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 36%SCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $145k → 8%FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $185k → 15%GARRARD COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 16%WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $120k → 18%PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $240k → 25%JOHNSON COUNTY SCHOOLS: $80k → 26%CLAY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $80k → 35%SCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $140k → 8%FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $185k → 15%WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $120k → 18%PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $240k → 25%SCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $140k → 8%FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $180k → 15%PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $237k → 25%SCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $140k → 8%FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $176k → 15%PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $160k → 25%FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $93k → 15%PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $120k → 25%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 51 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 47 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
9

Total granted

$15M
$261k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $760k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.6M
  • FC
    FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.5M
  • SC
    SCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $880k

Funded once

  • LC
    LARUE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • WM
    WURTLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • LC
    LIVINGSTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIKE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $1,552,134 · OtherPIKE COUNTY SCHOOLSFAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,454,705 · OtherFAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSSCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $880,000 · OtherSCOTT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLWARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $763,011 · OtherCLAY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $700,000 · Other+72 more: $11,020,723 · Other+72 more
Other$16,370,573

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Whas Crusade for Children IncKY73.7× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · Share Our Strength · Save The Children Federation Inc · Kentucky Society for Technology in Education · Children Incorporated · Project Lead the Way Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Action for Healthy Kids · NRA Foundation Inc · Catholic Charities of Louisville Inc · Berea College · The Steele-Reese Foundation Xxxxx1004

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates’ filings →

More from the funding graph