Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joan Woodman Orton McCollum Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$420kCommunity Improvement$234kHealth$224kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kEducation$60kArts & Culture$50kReligion$50kPhilanthropy$32kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF RICHLAND CENTER$70,000
RICHLAND CENTER PERFORMING ARTS COU$45,000
RICHLAND CENTER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC$30,500
OCOOCH MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC$8,000
HORNET FOOTBALL SUMMER CAMPS INC$3,000
SYMONS RECREATION COMPLEX FOUNDATIO$3,000
RICHLAND CENTER DIAMOND CLUB INC$2,500
DISCOVERY PLAYSCHOOL INC$2,000
GREATER RICHLAND AREA CANCER ELIMIN$1,000
RICHLAND CO VETERANS HONOR ROLL INC$1,000
THE UNION LEARNING CADRE INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE RICHLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$996k · 21 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$996k
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+9%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SW
    SCHMITT WOODLAND HILLS INC
    2× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue +6%
  • GR
    GREATER RICHLAND AREA CANCER ELIMINATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +19%
  • RA
    RICHLAND AREA RESCUE INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • AG
    AD GERMAN WAREHOUSE CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -50% · 27% of their budget
  • MP
    MUSCODA PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • PV
    PINE VALLEY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Richland Youth Foundation
—
2
Humane Society of Richland County

Our mission is to advocate and compassionately care for the abandoned, abused, and neglected animals in our community, and to find them loving homes.

Animals
3
Richland County Historical Society

Educate public on area history.

—
4
Rice Lake Area Scholarship Foundation Inc

College scholarships

—
5
Raymond Central Communities Foundation

The Raymond Central Community Foundation recognizes a need to bring our communities together to improve the opportunities and facilities our students have available to them each day. The RC Community Foundation is a 501c3 organization…

Education
6
Richland Community Development Group Inc

To promote richland county's economic development and expansion.

Community Improvement
7
Richland Heritage Museum Foundation

To establish and maintain a historic museum(s)in & for Richland County,Il; to inform, educate and promote interest in the history of Richland County, State of Illinois

Arts & Culture
8
Richland County Development Corporation

To encourage and assist in the development of economic, educational and charitable activities of richland county, illinois and its surrounding communities.

Community Improvement
9
Friends and Foundation of Richland Library

Operated for the improvement, expansion, support, development, maintenance, enhancement, and upkeep of the buildings, equipment, and collections of the richland county public library.

Education
10
Richland Animal Rescue Equine Shelter

To rescue, house, and provide medical care for domestic animals, and to provide public education and financial support for humane community resource and service programs.

Animals
11
Richland Community College Foundation

To benefit richland community college.

—
12
Richland Youth Football Association
Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richland Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF RICHLAND CENTER: $296,000 · OtherCITY OF RICHLAND CENTERRICHLAND CENTER PERFORMING ARTS COU: $180,000 · OtherRICHLAND CENTER PERFORMING ARTS COUSOUTHWEST PARTNERS PINE RIVER TRAIL: $65,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST PARTNERS PINE RIVER TRAILAD GERMAN WAREHOUSE: $45,000 · OtherRICHLAND COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $40,000 · OtherRICHLAND CENTER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $30,500 · OtherBETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH CORPORATION: $30,000 · Other+27 more: $213,091 · Other+27 moreSOUTHWEST PARTNERS INC: $208,500 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHWEST PARTNERS …+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentAD GERMAN WAREHOUSE CONSERVANCY INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureRICHLAND CENTER HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS BOOSTER CLUB: $14,110 · EducationOCOOCH MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8,000 · AnimalsRICHLAND AREA RESCUE INC: $1,850 · AnimalsRICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $8,655 · ReligionRICHLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · Human Services
Other$899,591Youth Development$209,000Arts & Culture$50,000Education$14,110Animals$9,850Religion$8,655Human Services$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHWEST PARTNERS INC: $208,500 over 7y, 50% of budgetAD GERMAN WAREHOUSE CONSERVANCY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetSCHMITT WOODLAND HILLS INC: $21,641 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRICHLAND CENTER HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS BOOSTER CLUB: $14,110 over 3y, 10% of budgetDiscovery Playschool Inc: $9,200 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetRICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $8,655 over 1y, 19% of budgetOCOOCH MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetLA CROSSE LIONS CHARITIES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetRICHLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER RICHLAND AREA CANCER ELIMINATION INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetRICHLAND AREA RESCUE INC: $1,850 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPASSAGES A PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRICHLAND COUNTY CAMPUS FOUNDATION LTD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWEST PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds AD GERMAN WAREHOUSE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHMITT WOODLAND HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND CENTER HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Discovery Playschool Inc ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OCOOCH MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LA CROSSE LIONS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER RICHLAND AREA CANCER ELIMINATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SYMONS RECREATION COMPLEX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND AREA RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PASSAGES A PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND COUNTY CAMPUS FOUNDATION LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joan Woodman Orton McCollum Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joan Woodman Orton McCollum Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joan Woodman Orton McCollum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph