Skip to content

· Private foundation

JMS Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$632kEducation$190kFood & Nutrition$180kPhilanthropy$124kHuman Services$84kArts & Culture$78kHousing & Shelter$14kInternational$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Beth Israel Milton Hospital$50,000
Greater Boston Food Bank$35,000
Dana Farber Cancer Institute$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Brookline Community Fund$10,000
Combined Jewish Philanthropies$5,000
The Home for Little Wanderers$5,000
Rosies Place$4,000
Milton Council on Aging$3,500
Brookline Education Foundation$3,500
Pan Mass Challenge$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Old Colony Hospice: $1k → 8%South Shore YMCA: $3k → 8%The Home for Little Wanderers: $5k → 16%Home for Little Wanderers: $5k → 16%The Home for Little Wanderers: $5k → 16%Home for Little Wanderers: $5k → 16%Home for LIttle Wanderers: $5k → 16%Home for Little Wanderers: $5k → 16%Home for Little Wanderers: $5k → 16%Home for Little Wanderers: $5k → 16%Home for Little Wanderers: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
30

Total granted

$1.1M
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+24%

Still filing today

41%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $180k · revenue +84%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +162%
  • THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • SS
    South Shore Health Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • DI
    DANA-FARBER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +42%
  • SS
    South Shore Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
7
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Beth Israel Milton Hospital: $200,000 · OtherBeth Israel Milton HospitalGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $180,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCWGBH: $111,000 · OtherWGBHMilton Hospital - BID: $85,000 · OtherMilton Hospital - BIDMilton Hospital: $70,000 · OtherMilton HospitalIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+24 more: $225,000 · Other+24 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $146,000 · HealthDana-Farber Ca…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDR…ANGEL FUND INC: $10,000 · HealthANGEL FUND INC+2 more: $1,200 · HealthCURRY COLLEGE: $55,000 · EducationBROOKLINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $21,000 · EducationMILTON FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC: $7,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationBROOKLINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $15,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,200 · PhilanthropyTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesSouth Shore Young Men's Christian Association: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesROSIE'S PLACE INC: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterACCION INTERNATIONAL: $11,000 · InternationalTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$921,000Health$174,200Education$84,500Philanthropy$82,200Human Services$48,500Housing & Shelter$14,000International$11,000Arts & Culture$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $180,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $146,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCURRY COLLEGE: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACCION INTERNATIONAL: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMILTON FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSouth Shore Young Men's Christian Association: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN W RICHARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOld Colony Hospice Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON HIGASHI SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJETT FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CURRY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds DANA-FARBER INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLINE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILTON FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds South Shore Young Men's Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN W RICHARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Old Colony Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Rockland Trust - Blue Hills Charitable Foundation · The Flatley Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Abington Bank Community Foundation Inc F/K/A Envision Bank Foundation Inc · South Shore Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JMS Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JMS Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Old Colony Hospice Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Boston Higashi School Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Curry College: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on JMS Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph