Skip to content

· Public charity

Jingled Elves Inc

Provide funds to charities focused on improving the lives of women and children in Collier County, Florida through our annual trolley tour, sponsorships and private donations.

$361k
Granted FY2026still arriving
15
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Human Services$120kFood & Nutrition$105kYouth Development$70kEducation$60kHealth$55kScience & Tech$25kOther$0
02FY2026 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$79k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY$36,000
ALLIANCE FOR PERIOD SUPPLIES$33,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$32,000
COLLIER SENIOR CENTER$30,000
HARRY CHAPIN$30,000
OUR DAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY$25,000
LACES OF LOVE$25,000
LEARN 2 EARN$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS$20,000
GRACE PLACE$20,000
YOUTH HAVEN$20,000
FOSTERING SUCCESS$20,000
PARTNERS FOR BREAST CANCER$15,000
BIKES FOR TYKES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–26, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $32k → 11%BABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY: $20k → 10%BABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY: $20k → 10%BABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY: $36k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $25k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $20k → 10%YOUTH HAVEN: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$633k · 12 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$633k
$40k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $76k · revenue +3%
  • YH
    YOUTH HAVEN INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $65k · revenue +126%
  • PC
    PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $55k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • BS
    BAKER SENIOR CENTER
    one grant, 2025 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $13k
  • BN
    BEAR NECESSITIES PEDIATRIC CA
    one grant, 2025 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe Children Coalition Inc

The safe children coalition's mission is to protect children and youth, strengthen families, and build community.

Human Services
2
Cape Coral for the Children Inc
Youth Development
3
Floridas Love in Action
Human Services
4
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
5
Books for Collier Kids Inc

Books for collier kids provides new books to children in need. access to books addresses one of the most important factors affecting literacy. we give books to children in our community to take home,share,cherish and own.

Education
6
Central Florida Childrens Home

To provide homes for disadvantaged children.

Human Services
7
Florida Childrens Rights Coalition

Legal representation of children.

Community Improvement
8
Kids with Kindness Inc

Do acts of kindness for the community.

—
9
Hollys Hope of North Port
Education
10
All Faiths Food Bank Inc

Together with our partners, we provide healthy solutions to end hunger in our community.

Food & Nutrition
11
Boca Helping Hands Inc

Boca helping hands, inc. is a community-supported not-for-profit organization, incorporated in the state of florida in 2000, established to address increasing food insecurity and other challenges faced by the underservedcommunities in palm…

Food & Nutrition
12
The Children's Home Inc

To unlock the potential of at-risk children and families by providing compassionate and effective services that create opportunities for success.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Haven Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fostering Success Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIANCE FOR PERIOD SUPPLIES: $78,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR PERIOD SUPPLIESFOSTERING SUCCESS INC: $55,000 · OtherFOSTERING SUCCESS INCLEARN2EARN: $50,000 · OtherLEARN2EARNNAMI Collier County Inc: $35,000 · OtherNAMI Collier County IncFUN TIME CHILDRENS ACADEMY: $27,500 · OtherFUN TIME CHILDRENS ACADEMYPARTNERS FOR BREAST CANCER: $27,000 · OtherPARTNERS FOR BREAST CANCERBAKER SENIOR CENTER: $20,000 · OtherBAKER SENIOR CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE GRACE PLACE INC: $20,000 · OtherTHE GRACE PLACE INCIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · Other+1 more: $7,500 · OtherBABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY INC: $76,000 · Human ServicesBABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY INCBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $72,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INCYOUTH HAVEN INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN INCGuadalupe Center Inc: $35,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center IncLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $57,500 · EducationLACES OF LOV…COLLIER COUNTY SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER INC: $30,000 · EducationCOLLIER COUN…PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionOUR DAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY INCORPORATED: $25,000 · Food & NutritionBIKES FOR TYKES INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$352,500Human Services$248,000Education$87,500Youth Development$55,000Food & Nutrition$55,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBABY BASICS OF COLLIER COUNTY INC: $76,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $72,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLACES OF LOVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $57,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Collier County Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The League Club IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The League Club Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jingled Elves Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jingled Elves Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jingled Elves Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jingled Elves Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jingled Elves’ filings →

More from the funding graph