· Public charity
Jimmy McGrath Foundation
Unarmed and without any provocation, jimmy mcgrath was senselessly murdered in a surprise attack by a 16-year-old athlete from another school.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $68,211 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $76,386 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,175 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TUNNELS 2 TOWERS | $27,000 |
| DIMATTEO FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATI | $11,030 |
| FAIRFIELD PREP | $7,500 |
| WAKEMAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $6,500 |
| BRIDGEPORT YOUTH LACROSSE | $5,900 |
| ADAMS HOUSE | $5,181 |
| THE CARVER | $5,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Children battling cancer
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.
Wipe out kids cancer offers comfort and hope to kids with cancer through support programs serving the entire family and funds innovative research leading to new discoveries and treatments in the fight against pediatric cancer. "support and…
D-Feet Cancer The Dalton Fox Foundation raises awareness of Ewing Sarcoma and other under-studied pediatric cancers. By directly funding research into these cancers, we are determined to help discover more effective and less toxic…
One Summit's mission is to help childhood cancer patients build courage, self-confidence, and resilience through experiential learning and mentorship with a U.S. Navy Seal. Our experiential learning takes place in the form of indoor rock…
Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Adam Wysota Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fairfield Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds BRIDGEPORT YOUTH LACROSSE INC ↗
- Who funds DIMATTEO FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARMS WIDE OPEN CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAIRFIELD ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ADAM WYSOTA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARVER INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jimmy McGrath Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bridgeport Youth Lacrosse Inc — 46% of income from government
- The Carver Inc — 19% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.