Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jim and Joan Walsh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$117kHealth$97kEducation$75kPhilanthropy$70kYouth Development$17kAnimals$15kArts & Culture$11kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$400
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way$25,000
M E A L S$8,000
Our Lady of Sorrows Church$7,900
Catholic Charities$7,500
Binghamton University$5,000
Emory University$5,000
A Room to Heal$4,000
Calvary Love Church$4,000
Sjogrens Foundation$1,500
Humane Society$1,350
C C F$889
NYU School of Law$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Prostate Cancer Foundation$400
Susan B Komen Foundation$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Mercy House: $5k → 20%Action for Older Persons: $3k → 20%Mercy House: $1k → 20%Mercy House: $700 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 43 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
36

Total granted

$386k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+65%

Still filing today

19%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $17k · revenue +120%
  • AR
    A ROOM TO HEAL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +434%
  • MH
    MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $7k · revenue +209%

Funded once

  • GP
    Gigis Playhouse
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • JS
    JOE SANTACROSE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • EU
    Emary University
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Als Association Upstate New York Chapter Inc

To lead the fight to cure and treat als through global, cutting edge research and patient care.

—
2
New York State Chapter American College of Cardiology

The chapter acts as an adviser to governmental and professional organizations regarding cardiovascular disease. the chapter represents the various interests of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and other medical specialists, and its members…

—
3
Associated Medical Schools of New York

Amsny, the statewide consortium of medical schools in new york, works with its academic, scientific, healthcare, patient advocacy and business partners to advance medical education, biomedical research, and healthcare delivery. this unique…

Education
4
New York Cardiothoracic Transplant Consortium Inc

To bring together heart and lung transplant professionals dedicated to collaboration, data sharing and peer review to enhance the quality of heart and lung transplant services.

Health
5
New York City Aids Memorial Inc

The New York City AIDS Memorial honors the more than 100,000 New Yorkers who have died of AIDS and acknowledges the contributions of caregivers and activists who mobilized to provide care for the ill, fight discrimination, lobby for…

Arts & Culture
6
Lung Transplant Project Foundation

To support the research that will minimize rejection and infection, and reduce waiting times for lung transplant patients; to build a community of patients, caregivers, and medical staff; to advocate and educate about lung transplant…

—
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Answer Als

To find solutions for people living with als now and for the future by utilizing knowledge of patients, leading researchers and technology to seek immediate solutions to improve the lives of those living with als until a treatment or cure…

Health
9
Early Diagnosis and Treatment Research Foundation Inc

To further & support research in the field of early diagnosis & treatment of disease. primarily engaging in continuous, active conduct of research to develop the knowledge base for the practice of screening for early diseases such as lung…

Health
10
Aizer Health Inc

A freestanding diagnostic and treatment center licensed under article 28 of the new york state public health law. the center provides a broad range of health services to a largely medically underserved population.

Human Services
11
Als United Greater New York Inc

To support & empower the als community through a collaborative approach to fostering bold research initiatives, advancing national and state advocacy, & providing comprehensive care to individuals & families affected by als.

—
12
Angioma Alliance Dba Alliance to Cure Cavernous Malformations

The mission of angioma alliance is to drive a cure for cavernous malformation and improves lives for all affected.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Room to Heal; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Way: $130,000 · OtherUnited WayCatholic Charities: $40,700 · OtherCatholic CharitiesOur Lady of Sorrows Church: $21,550 · OtherOur Lady of Sorrows ChurchEmory University: $15,000 · OtherBinghamton University: $15,000 · OtherEmery University: $15,000 · OtherM E A L S: $14,000 · OtherOur Lady of Sarrows: $12,750 · Other+63 more: $114,540 · Other+63 moreA ROOM TO HEAL: $16,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $975 · HealthTHE DANIELLE HOUSE INC: $950 · Health+2 more: $800 · HealthFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $16,700 · EducationNOAH FARRELLY MEMORIAL FUND: $1,000 · EducationMERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $6,700 · Human ServicesAction for Older Persons Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesGoodwill Theatre Inc: $3,800 · Arts & Culture
Other$378,540Health$18,725Education$17,700Human Services$9,200Arts & Culture$3,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC: $16,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA ROOM TO HEAL: $16,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetMERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $6,700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGoodwill Theatre Inc: $3,800 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAction for Older Persons Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNOAH FARRELLY MEMORIAL FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $975 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DANIELLE HOUSE INC: $950 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC ↗
  • Who funds A ROOM TO HEAL ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC ↗
  • Who funds Goodwill Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds Action for Older Persons Inc ↗
  • Who funds NOAH FARRELLY MEMORIAL FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Conrad & Virginia Klee Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jim and Joan Walsh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jim and Joan Walsh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jim and Joan Walsh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph