· Public charity
Jewish Aid Worldwide America Israel and Beyond Inc
We work with other not-for-profit organizations to help them increase their participation and success in public-sector workplace charitable fund drives.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $79,881 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $128,457 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $48,576 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EZER MIZION | $19,032 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER | $15,665 |
| HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH AND ARAB | $10,420 |
| ISRAEL CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION | $8,378 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION | $7,877 |
| FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH | $6,334 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $6,295 |
| JERUSALEM FOUNDATION | $5,880 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To further jewish education in israel
Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.
Friends of Jerusalem's mission is to provide assistance to the needs and indigent living in Jerusalem and all of Israel.
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
Support for schools in israel conducting post high school programs in various courses of jewish studies, touring and volunteer work all in israel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yad Eliezer and the most unlike its peers is Israel Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OGEN INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jewish Aid Worldwide America Israel and Beyond Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jewish Aid Worldwide America Israel and Beyond Inc?
Find your warmest path to Jewish Aid Worldwide America Israel and Beyond Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.