Skip to content
Jess Parrish Medical Foundationinc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Jess Parrish Medical Foundationinc

Support for parrish medical center, inc.

$388k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$251k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.7MHuman Services$40kEducation$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kYouth Development$8kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $354,115, the rows itemized in this filing. The $387,615 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $33,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
  • $250k+1 grant · $251k
$88,984
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARRISH MEDICAL CENTER$251,269
NORTH BREVARD MEDICAL SUPPORT$88,984
CITY OF TITUSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT$7,862
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TITUSVILLE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA: $15k → 10%YMCA: $15k → 10%NORTH BREVARD CHARITITES SHARING: $10k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 5 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$3.0M
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-29%
+15%

Still filing today

20%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NORTH BREVARD COUNTY HOSPITAL DIST PARRISH MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M
  • NB
    NORTH BREVARD MEDICAL SUPPORT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M
  • CO
    CITY OF TITUSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT
    3× · 2019–2025 · $34k

Funded once

  • WO
    WALK ON WATER MINISTRIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +69%
  • NB
    NORTH BREVARD CHARITIES SHARING CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +15%
  • US
    US SPACE WALK OF FAME FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Clubs of Lee County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
2
Young Men's Christian Association of the Suncoast Inc

In 2025, the ymca of the suncoast served over 93,500 men, women, and children in pinellas, pasco, hernando, citrus, and levy counties of florida. the y provides opportunities for all ages to learn, grow, and thrive. see expanded mission on…

Human Services
3
Space Coast Health Foundation Inc

The space coast health foundation will enhance the health and wellness of individuals and communities in brevard county. the foundation will carry out this mission by: routinely talking with the community to maintain a pulse on the health…

Health
4
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
5
Girl Scouts of West Central Florida Inc

Building girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

—
6
Southwest Florida Council Inc

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—
7
West Orange Dream Center Inc

West orange dream center (wodc) is a faith based, not-for-profit neighborhood center offering resources and services to economically struggling individuals and families.

Human Services
8
Orange County 4-H Association

4H Youth Development

Youth Development
9
Camp Fire Usa Sunshine Council Inc

In lieu of a mission statement, camp fire has a promise: young people want to change the world. camp fire provides the opportunity to find their spark, lift their voice, and discover who they are. in camp fire, it begins now. light the…

—
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Florida Inc

For over 40 years, bbbscfl has operated under the belief that the ability to succeed and thrive in life is inherent in every child. bbbscfl's roots began in 1975 under the leadership of community volunteers. serving orange, seminole,…

—
11
United Way Suncoast Inc

United way suncoast's mission is to mobilize communities to action so all can thrive. (continued on schedule o)

Philanthropy
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Virginia

Boys & girls clubs of central virginia enables all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible members of the communities in which they live.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Walk On Water Ministries of Central Florida Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH BREVARD COUNTY HOSPITAL DIST PARRISH MEDICAL CENTER: $1,650,964 · OtherNORTH BREVARD COUNTY HOSPITAL DIST PARRISH MEDICAL CENTERNORTH BREVARD MEDICAL SUPPORT INC: $1,306,697 · OtherNORTH BREVARD MEDICAL SUPPORT INC+6 more: $81,608 · OtherCENTRAL FLORIDA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesNORTH BREVARD CHARITIES SHARING CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesWALK ON WATER MINISTRIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $15,000 · ReligionUS SPACE WALK OF FAME FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,039,269Human Services$48,000Religion$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL FLORIDA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWALK ON WATER MINISTRIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNORTH BREVARD CHARITIES SHARING CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUS SPACE WALK OF FAME FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGirl Scouts of Citrus Council Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREVARD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVICTORY KIDS SPORTS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Brevard…Community Foundation …The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Brevard County IncFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Brevard County Inc · Community Foundation for Brevard Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jess Parrish Medical Foundationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jess Parrish Medical Foundationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • South Brevard Women's Center Inc: 45% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jess Parrish Medical Foundationinc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home