How much did JESS & MARILYN PECK FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of JESS & MARILYN PECK FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k9 grants · $29k
$10k–50k8 grants · $171k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

ABILITY INCLUSION SERVICES$36,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$25,000
CAMP KOSTOPULOS$25,000
ABILITY FOUNDATION$20,000
NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER$20,000
CHAIN BREAKER FOUNDATION$15,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$15,000
UTAH COUNCIL OF THE BLIND$15,000
THE INN BETWEEN$5,000
JORDAN HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
COTTONWOOD HIGH SCHOOL PTA$5,000
UTAH KIDS FOUNDATION$5,000
PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$3,000
REAL LIFE$2,000
BEST SEAT IN THE HOUSE$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$983k · 17 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$983k

$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+220%

Still filing today

47%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NA
NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER
6× · 2020–2025 · $114k · revenue +35%
AF
ABILITY FOUNDATION
5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +51%
TI
THE INN BETWEEN
6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +59%

Funded once

ES
ENGLISH SKILLS LEARNING CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +220%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Utah Autism Foundation

Philanthropy

Autism Foundation of Utah

Health

Ability 1st Utah

Assisting persons with disabilities to develop independent living and social skills, assisting with housing and transportation needs, rights advocacy, and counseling.

Human Services

Utah Independent Living Center Inc

Assisting disabled individuals in developing independent living skills, social skills, housing and transportation, rights advocacy and counseling, assisting disabled individuals identify equipment needs to enable them to live more…

—

Utah Parent Center Inc

Our mission is to help parents help their children, youth and young adults with all disabilities to live included, productive lives as members of the community.

Human Services

The Utah Schools for the Deaf and

To provide resources and financial support to meet the unique need of the children and families served by the Utah Schools for the Deaf and Blind (USDB).

Education

National Federation of the Blind of Utah

The National Federation of the Blind of Utah is an organization made up of blind and sighted people working to improve the lives of blind Utah residents by providing assistance and services to parents, blind workers, and consumers of…

Health

United Disabilities Services

Helps to enhance the independence, thus enriching and changing the lives of individuals with physical and age related disabilities through care and support services.

Health

Enableutah Inc

Enable utah was established to provide training and work experience for disabled individuals in an effort to help them achieve greater independence.

Employment

Center for Disabilities

Empowering people with disabilities to function as independently as possible and to be active, contributing members of society.

Human Services

Utah Athletic Foundation

Foster development of winter sports in utah and manage and maintain the utah olympic park, utah olympic oval and soldier hollow nordic center

Recreation & Sports

Friends of the Salt Lake City

Friends of the slc public library supports the library by sponsoring periodic used book sales and events to raise funds for library programs and to encourage literacy and learning within the community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ability Center and the most unlike its peers is Best Seat in the House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

7/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$814,000Recreation & Sports$114,000Human Services$81,100Education$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT20.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Henry W & Leslie M Eskuche · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Castle Foundation · Herbert I & Elsa B Michael Foundation · Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Making a Difference Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JESS & MARILYN PECK FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: UTAH COUNCIL OF THE BLIND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 870415001 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on UTAH COUNCIL OF THE BLIND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jess & Marilyn Peck Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jess & Marilyn Peck Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JESS & MARILYN PECK FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jess & Marilyn Peck Foundation?

More from the funding graph

JESS & MARILYN PECK FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jess & Marilyn Peck Foundation?

More from the funding graph