Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jerry & Brenda Rush Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$770kReligion$45kHousing & Shelter$19kEducation$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kFood & Nutrition$6kPhilanthropy$5kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$5,364
Median grant
5
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$79,500
SCHREIBER CENTER$6,000
HARFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL$5,364
GREENSBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
YOUTH BENEFIT ELEMENTARY$3,509
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCIL: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
WV
MD
DE
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$839k · 12 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +141% since the first grant, against +68% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$839k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+141%
+68%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HIGHLANDS SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +40%
  • FV
    FALLSTON VOLUNTEER FIRE & AMBULANCE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $11k · revenue +40%
  • HW
    HOUSING WORKS INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • CB
    CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • BA
    BEL AIR UNITED METHODIST
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • TH
    THE HIGHLANDS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
2
The Humane Society of Harford County Inc

The humane society of harford county's mission is to promote the humane treatment of homeless, stray and abandoned animals by providing shelter, care, adoptions and community education.

Animals
3
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
4
Harbors Home Health and Hospice

To provide home health and hospice services to persons in grays harbor and pacific counties who need assistance to remain active and independent within their own home.

Health
5
Berks Community Health Center

Berks community health center provides exceptional family-centered primary and preventive healthcare for all residents of berks county, regardless of economic status.

Health
6
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

—
7
Historical Society Harford Cou

Preserve the history of Harford County, Maryland

—
8
Baltimore Regional Housing Partnership Inc

The baltimore regional housing partnership expands housing choices for low-income families who have historically been excluded from housing in well-resourced areas.

Housing & Shelter
9
Maryland Citizens' Health Initiative Education Fund Inc

To promote affordable healthcare.

Health
10
Harford Memorial Hospital Inc

Dedication to maintaining and improving the health of the people in its communities through an integrated health delivery system that provides high quality care to all.

Health
11
Moveable Feast Inc

Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…

—
12
Harford Crisis Center Inc

The organization provides mental healthcare to the communities in harford county, maryland.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harford Family House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Berkeley County Congregational Cooperative Action Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $760,840 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE+24 more: $100,624 · Other+24 moreTHE HIGHLANDS SCHOOL INC: $12,001 · EducationFALLSTON VOLUNTEER FIRE & AMBULANCE: $11,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHOUSING WORKS INC: $8,000 · Community ImprovementNEW REACH INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterLOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC: $3,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHY KIDS RUNNING SERIES: $750 · AnimalsUpper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc: $500 · Health
Other$861,464Education$12,001Public Safety & Disaster$11,000Community Improvement$8,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Human Services$3,000Animals$750Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HIGHLANDS SCHOOL INC: $12,001 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFALLSTON VOLUNTEER FIRE & AMBULANCE: $11,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARFORD FAMILY HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEW REACH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBERKELEY COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBERKELEY COUNTY CONGREGATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTION PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY KIDS RUNNING SERIES: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND SOCIETY FOR SIGHT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUpper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HIGHLANDS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FALLSTON VOLUNTEER FIRE & AMBULANCE ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARFORD FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW REACH INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY COUNTY CONGREGATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY KIDS RUNNING SERIES ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND SOCIETY FOR SIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Upper Chesapeake Health Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dresher Foundation IncMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dresher Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerry & Brenda Rush Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerry & Brenda Rush Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • New Reach Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Harford Family House Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc: 6% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Delaware Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jerry & Brenda Rush Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph