Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jerome Nerenberg 2000 Charitable Trust Uad

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$2.4MEducation$2.2MArts & Culture$942kHuman Services$857kInternational$857kReligion$600kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.0M
$77,710
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$166,522
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC$111,015
LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$111,015
THE SALVATION ARMY$111,015
LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO$88,812
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$77,710
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC$77,710
GATEWAY FOUNDATION INC$66,609
HEBREW UNION COLLEGE$66,609
NEWBERRY LIBRARY$55,507
Individual grant recipient$55,507
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$55,507
MUSICIANS CLUB OF WOMEN$33,304
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $139k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $209k → 10%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $139k → 9%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $97k → 13%HEBREW UNION COLLEGE: $83k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $139k → 14%LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $135k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $202k → 10%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $135k → 9%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $94k → 13%HEBREW UNION COLLEGE: $81k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $135k → 14%LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $133k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $202k → 10%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $133k → 9%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $93k → 13%HEBREW UNION COLLEGE: $80k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $133k → 14%LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $124k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $186k → 10%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $124k → 9%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $87k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $124k → 14%LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $111k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $167k → 10%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $111k → 9%THE SALVATION ARMY: $111k → 14%LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $110k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $165k → 10%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $110k → 9%THE SALVATION ARMY: $110k → 14%LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $105k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION: $158k → 10%AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $105k → 9%THE SALVATION ARMY: $105k → 14%JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $97k → 17%LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO: $111k → 14%JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $94k → 17%LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO: $108k → 14%JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $93k → 17%LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO: $106k → 14%JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $87k → 17%LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO: $99k → 14%LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO: $89k → 14%LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO: $88k → 14%LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO: $84k → 14%GATEWAY FOUNDATION INC: $83k → 14%GATEWAY FOUNDATION INC: $81k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.3M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$8.3M
$0

Still filing today

62%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +56%
  • LR
    LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $857k · revenue +23%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $857k · revenue +90%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    New York University

    Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

    Education
    2
    University of Chicago Medical Center

    Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

    Health
    3
    Target Als Foundation Inc

    Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

    Education
    4
    New York Genome Center Inc

    Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

    Health
    5
    The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

    Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

    —
    6
    American Museum of Natural History

    The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

    Arts & Culture
    7
    Association for Computing Machinery Inc

    We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

    Science & Tech
    8
    Lupus Foundation of America Inc

    Lupus foundation of america, inc. (the foundation) is dedicated to improving the quality of life for all people affected by lupus through programs of research, education, support, and advocacy.

    Health
    9
    William Marsh Rice University

    As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

    Education
    10
    University of Chicago

    The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

    Education
    11
    American Neuromuscular Foundation

    The american neuromuscular foundation was established to improve the quality of care for people with disorders of skeletal muscle, neuromuscular function, and central and peripheral nervous systems through the promotion of research and…

    Health
    12
    American College of Physicians Inc

    The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Musicians Club of Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $1,288,633 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $856,794 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $599,755 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICAHEBREW UNION COLLEGE: $514,076 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGEMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $428,397 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERINGIndividual grant recipient: $428,397 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMUSICIANS CLUB OF WOMEN: $257,038 · OtherMUSICIANS CLUB OF WOMENLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $856,794 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATI…ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $599,755 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INCGateway Foundation Inc: $514,076 · HealthGateway Foundation IncAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $856,794 · InternationalAMERICARES …Lyric Opera of Chicago: $685,436 · Arts & CultureLyric Ope…THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $428,397 · Education
    Other$4,373,090Health$1,970,625International$856,794Arts & Culture$685,436Education$428,397

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $1,288,633 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $856,794 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $856,794 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $685,436 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $599,755 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGateway Foundation Inc: $514,076 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $428,397 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMUSICIANS CLUB OF WOMEN: $257,038 over 7y, 41% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
    • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds Gateway Foundation Inc ↗
    • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds MUSICIANS CLUB OF WOMEN ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Jerome Nerenberg 2000 Charitable Trust Uad funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerome Nerenberg 2000 Charitable Trust Uad. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jerome Nerenberg 2000 Charitable Trust Uad’s filings →

    More from the funding graph