Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jennie H Southall Memorial Trust 460001019

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$21kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kMembership Benefit$18kHuman Services$16kHealth$13kEmployment$13kArts & Culture$11kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$440k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,074
MAURY COUNTY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS$5,000
ROOM IN THE INN$2,500
JAMES K POLK HOME & MUSEUM$2,000
THRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$2,000
AMUSE'UM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES: $5k → 10%THRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES: $2k → 10%THRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES: $2k → 10%THRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES: $2k → 10%THRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$100k · 11 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$100k
$32k

Still filing today

27%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MAURY COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
    3× · 2019–2022 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2018–2025 · $17k
  • TL
    THRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES CORP
    5× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +249%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAURY COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • MC
    MAURY COUNTY STUDENTS IN TRANSITION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAURY COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $20,500 · OtherMAURY COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENTIndividual grant recipient: $16,788 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTH CENTRAL MENTAL HEALTH: $9,000 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL MENTAL HEALTHROSE HILL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $9,000 · OtherROSE HILL CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONMAURY COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER: $8,000 · OtherMAURY COUNTY RESOURCE CENTERMAURY COUNTY LIBRARY: $6,835 · OtherMAURY COUNTY LIBRARYAMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY: $6,000 · OtherCROSSROADS TO HOME: $6,000 · OtherCENTER OF HOPE: $5,700 · OtherMAURY COUNTY STUDENTS IN TRANSITION: $5,000 · OtherMAURY COUNTY SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS: $5,000 · OtherROOM AT THE INN: $4,227 · Other+12 more: $21,500 · Other+12 moreTHRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES CORP: $13,000 · Human ServicesTHRIFT LOV…MAURY COUNTY ARTS GUILD: $6,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$123,550Human Services$13,000Arts & Culture$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES CORP: $13,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetMAURY COUNTY ARTS GUILD: $6,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE: $5,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THRIFT LOVE FOR VOCATIONAL ABILITIES CORP ↗
  • Who funds MAURY COUNTY ARTS GUILD ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF HOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jennie H Southall Memorial Trust 460001019 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jennie H Southall Memorial Trust 460001019. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jennie H Southall Memorial Trust 460001019’s filings →

    More from the funding graph