Skip to content
Jefferson Community Technical College Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Jefferson Community Technical College Foundation Inc

The mission of the jefferson community & technical college foundation, inc.

$481k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$181k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$6.7MYouth Development$68kPhilanthropy$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kHousing & Shelter$24kEnvironment$23kEmployment$17kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $240,742, the rows itemized in this filing. The $480,842 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $240,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $181k
$13,245
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE$181,116
VALUMARKET$24,283
CAPE ELECTRICAL$13,245
Individual grant recipient$10,098
MILLINIUM TOOL$6,000
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LLC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC: $22k → 18%NEW READERS PRESS: $9k → 14%FLUID CHILLERS INC: $6k → 16%CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LLC: $6k → 11%SARAH NUNEZ CONSULTING AND EDUCATION SERVICES LLC: $7k → 12%CENTER FOR STRATEGIC DIVERSITY & CHANGE LLC: $50k → 14%STATWAX LLC: $23k → 5%IU SOUTHEAST: $47k → 10%STORYBOLT INC: $15k → 15%OLDHAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $14k → 4%ROSEMOUNT INC: $11k → 9%VALUMARKET: $24k → 15%CAPE ELECTRICAL: $13k → 18%BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC: $7k → 18%STATWAX LLC: $20k → 5%IU SOUTHEAST: $21k → 10%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $3.8M → 15%CAPE ELECTRICAL: $6k → 18%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $666k → 15%CAPE ELECTRICAL: $5k → 18%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $476k → 15%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $469k → 15%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $364k → 15%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $345k → 15%HERBERT HAROLD ALPIGER: $50k → 15%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $181k → 15%MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY: $10k → 15%BEST BUY: $25k → 15%JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $79k → 15%JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $50k → 15%JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $24k → 15%BARNES & NOBLE: $53k → 15%BARNES & NOBLE: $6k → 15%MRC GLOBAL: $5k → 15%HATFIELD MEDIA: $13k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
CA
MO
KY
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 8 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$6.7M
$206k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $6.3M
  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $152k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $68k

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR STRATEGIC DIVERSITY & CHANGE LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2019 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6,317,757 · OtherJEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE+23 more: $682,199 · Other+23 more
Other$6,999,956

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jefferson Community Technical College’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home