Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jearl Smart Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$840kReligion$118kPublic Benefit$105kCommunity Improvement$84kArts & Culture$62kAnimals$23kHealth$14kHuman Services$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
$2,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY$21,000
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$15,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$12,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SEMINOLE NATION OF OKLAHOMA$9,750
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$8,750
SEMINOLE NATION MUSEUM$5,500
Individual grant recipient$4,500
WEWOKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$3,500
SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE$3,450
OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$3,250
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$3,000
OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$2,750
MURRAY STATE COLLEGE$2,000
PONTOTOC TECHNOLOGY CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW AGE PROJECT: $3k → 23%NEW AGE PROJECT INC: $1k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
CA
CO
AZ
KS
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 49 repeat orgs$196k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

16%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    Oklahoma Christian University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +10%
  • SN
    SEMINOLE NATION HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $23k · revenue +9%
  • CK
    CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • WP
    WEWOKA PUBLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $58k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION
    one grant, 2022 · $28k
  • WL
    WEWOKA LION CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Western Governors University

Wgu's mission is to change lives for the better by creating pathways to opportunity. wgu does this by operating and administering an institution of higher education and learning.

Education
3
Ouachita Baptist University

Ouachita baptist university is a christ-centered learning community. embracing the liberal arts tradition, the university prepares individuals for ongoing intellectual and spiritual growth, lives of meaningful work, and reasoned engagement…

Education
4
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
5
University of the Southwest

University of the southwest is a christ-centered educational community dedicated to developing men and women for a lifetime of servant leadership by emphasizing faith, responsibility, and initiative.

Education
6
Stevenson University

The university is an innovative, coeducational, independent institution offering undergraduate and graduate students a career-focused education marked by individualized attention, civility, and respect for difference. the university blends…

Education
7
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
8
University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma Foundation Inc

The purpose of the USAO Foundation is to support the mission of the University of Science & Arts of Oklahoma.

Education
9
Southwestern Christian University

Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Southwestern Christian College

Its purpose is to offer a holistic educational program that will motivate the student to value and achieve academi excellence within the context of commitment to moral and spiritual values.

Education
12
LeTourneau University

Letourneau university is a comprehensive institution of christian higher education where educators engage learners to nurture christian virtue, to develop competency and ingenuity in their professional fields, to integrate faith and work,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City University; the most unlike its peers is New Age Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY: $156,350 · OtherEAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITYWEWOKA LIONS CLUB: $103,655 · OtherWEWOKA LIONS CLUBWEWOKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $102,313 · OtherWEWOKA PUBLIC SCHOOLSOSU: $97,425 · OtherOSUFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $96,175 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHSEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE: $92,638 · OtherSEMINOLE STATE COLLEGEOU: $76,750 · OtherOUWEWOKA PUBLIC SCHOOL: $57,500 · Other+63 more: $409,515 · Other+63 moreOklahoma Christian University: $56,750 · EducationOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $13,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $7,000 · EducationThe University of Tulsa: $4,500 · Education+3 more: $5,000 · EducationCENTER FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementSHAWNEE FORWARD INC: $1,500 · Community ImprovementCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,330 · Youth DevelopmentNew Age Project Inc: $3,500 · Human ServicesWILDCARE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Animals
Other$1,192,321Education$96,500Community Improvement$16,500Youth Development$10,330Human Services$3,500Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma Christian University: $56,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSEMINOLE NATION HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $22,500 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $13,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,330 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Age Project Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST GREGORY'S UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma Christian University ↗
  • Who funds SEMINOLE NATION HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Patterson Family Foundation · Oklahoma Humanities Council Inc · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jearl Smart Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jearl Smart Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Christian University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jearl Smart Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jearl Smart Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jearl Smart’s filings →

More from the funding graph