Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jdh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$95k
Granted FY2023
22
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$176kReligion$146kEducation$9kHealth$2kYouth Development$2kPhilanthropy$1kFood & Nutrition$525Arts & Culture$250Other$0
02FY2023 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $34,093, the rows itemized in this filing. The $94,812 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,719 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k21 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$410
Median grant
4
States reached
$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$14,750
BAIS MEDRASH OF WESTGATE$9,410
MESIVTA OF EASTERN PKWY$2,036
RCCS$1,300
PROJECT EXTREME$1,250
TAG$800
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ HATORAH$540
TASHBAR$520
BAIS DIN OF LAKEWOOD$500
UTA$500
A TIME$410
CHESED FUND$380
BYTCS SCHOOL$371
RELIEF$250
TTYF FOR YUNGELEIT OF BMG$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $736) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GEMACH OF JACKSON: $200 → 11%ASHREINU: $36 → 20%MACHZIKEI YISROEL: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$237k · 29 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 27 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
69

Total granted

$237k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+37%

Still filing today

28%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’23
EducationReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2k · revenue +65%
  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1k · revenue +54%
  • ON
    OHR NOSSON INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $466 · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • BM
    BAIS MEDRASH OF LAKEWOOD COMMONS
    one grant, 2020 · $89k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $880
  • C
    CHARIDY
    one grant, 2020 · $566
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
2
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
3
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
4
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
5
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
6
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
7
Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc

Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students

Education
8
Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc

Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
9
Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc

Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
10
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
11
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
12
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bnos Orchos Chaim Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS: $188,942 · OtherVARIOUSBAIS MEDRASH OF LAKEWOOD COMMONS: $89,000 · OtherBAIS MEDRASH OF LAKEWOOD COMMONSYESHIVATH RADIN: $15,885 · Other+85 more: $49,606 · Other+85 moreYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $1,800 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $1,396 · EducationBNOS ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $750 · EducationYESHIVA RUACH HATORAH INC: $560 · EducationYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $460 · EducationCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $370 · EducationTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $325 · Education+5 more: $527 · EducationTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $323 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $286 · ReligionKEREN ZICHRON YOSEF INC: $180 · ReligionYESODEI HADAS INC: $180 · ReligionAHAVA VACHVA SIMCHA FUND INC: $150 · ReligionYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $100 · ReligionYESHIVA SHAAREI OORAH INC: $100 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $100 · ReligionKEREN BNEI TORAH: $54 · Religion+2 more: $35 · ReligionCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $1,250 · Youth DevelopmentMACHZIKEI YISROEL INC: $500 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $410 · Human ServicesGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $200 · Human Services+1 more: $36 · Human ServicesOHR NOSSON INC: $466 · PhilanthropyEIZER CHAIM YOM TOV INC: $36 · Philanthropy
Other$343,433Education$6,188Religion$1,508Youth Development$1,250Human Services$1,146Philanthropy$502

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $1,396 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNOS ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA RUACH HATORAH INC: $560 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMACHZIKEI YISROEL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOHR NOSSON INC: $466 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $370 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $323 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $286 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAVNEI KODESH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEMACH OF JACKSON INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY INC: $158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVA VACHVA SIMCHA FUND INC: $150 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA SHAAREI OORAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEOROS BAIS YAAKOV INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS ESTHER MALKA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN BNEI TORAH: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAshreinu Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEIZER CHAIM YOM TOV INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUPAS YOM TOV INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME ↗
  • Who funds BNOS ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA RUACH HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds MACHZIKEI YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR NOSSON INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds CONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY46.3× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Jsp Family Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jdh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jdh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jdh Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jdh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $110k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jdh’s filings →

More from the funding graph