Skip to content
Jcc Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jcc Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$678kHousing & Shelter$148kHealth$69kRecreation & Sports$40kHuman Services$7kFood & Nutrition$2kReligion$1kYouth Development$450
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$21,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KU (KANSAS UNIVERSITY) ENDOWMENT$21,000
BAXTER SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AR PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%KU (KANSAS UNIVERSITY) ENDOWMENT: $239k → 15%BAXTER SPRINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 16%ST JUDES CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%JAR OF HOPE: $1k → 6%AR PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT: $225k → 15%BAXTER SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 16%ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%ESTEM: $100 → 17%KU (KANSAS UNIVERSITY) ENDOWMENT: $115k → 15%ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%AR PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%KU (KANSAS UNIVERSITY) ENDOWMENT: $53k → 15%ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%OUR HOUSE: $87k → 17%KU (KANSAS UNIVERSITY) ENDOWMENT: $21k → 15%OUR HOUSE: $38k → 17%OUR HOUSE: $13k → 17%OUR HOUSE: $11k → 17%FAMILY HOME FOR THE HEALING: $1k → 17%FAMILY HOME FOR THE HEALING: $1k → 17%MAKE A WISH: $1k → 17%HOME FOR THE HEALING: $1k → 17%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%HOME FOR THE HEALING: $1k → 17%PARK: $10k → 17%PARK: $10k → 17%PARK: $10k → 17%PARK: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $1k → 17%ARKANSAS FOOD BANK: $1k → 17%ARKANSAS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ARKANSAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%BOY SCOUTS OF ARKANSAS: $350 → 17%LITTLE ROCK COMPASSION CENTER: $1k → 17%ACCESS SCHOOLS: $1k → 17%SEIS PUENTES (BUTTERFLY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES): $1k → 17%ACCESS SCHOOLS: $1k → 17%SEIS PUENTES (BUTTERFLY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES): $1k → 17%ACCESS SCHOOLS: $1k → 17%SEIS PUENTES (BUTTERFLY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES): $1k → 17%ACCESS SCHOOLS: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$707k · 14 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$707k
$238k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-5%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +24%
  • AC
    ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +46%
  • BC
    BUTTERFLY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +263%

Funded once

  • KU
    KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $225k
  • BS
    BAXTER SPRINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • JO
    JAR OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Children's Research Institute

The vision of arkansas children's research institute is to be a leader in cutting-edge research that improves the health and well-being of children and their families. in support of this vision, arkansas children's research institute aims…

—
2
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
3
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
4
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
6
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
7
Arkansas Children's Northwest Inc

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
10
Arkansas Children's Inc

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values are the organizational…

Health
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arkansas Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KU (KANSAS UNIVERSITY) ENDOWMENT: $427,775 · OtherKU (KANSAS UNIVERSITY) ENDOWMENTKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT: $225,000 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENTOUR HOUSE INC: $148,450 · OtherOUR HOUSE INCPARK: $40,000 · Other+12 more: $55,450 · Other+12 moreARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $15,000 · HealthARKANSAS PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthPARENTS AND FRIENDS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $2,000 · Health+4 more: $4,000 · HealthBUTTERFLY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 · ReligionARKANSAS FOODBANK: $2,000 · Food & NutritionE-STEM HIGH PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $100 · Education
Other$896,675Health$44,000Religion$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Education$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $148,450 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUTTERFLY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetARKANSAS PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPARENTS AND FRIENDS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAR OF HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetE-STEM HIGH PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds BUTTERFLY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS AND FRIENDS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds JAR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds E-STEM HIGH PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Fo…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jcc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jcc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jcc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home