Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jca Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$678k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$344k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$4.2MReligion$180kHealth$145kArts & Culture$112kFood & Nutrition$107kMembership Benefit$25kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $167k
  • $250k+1 grant · $344k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$344,195
FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS$107,200
CROWN CENTER$60,000
GREATER ST LOUIS CHAPTER AMERICAN PARKINSON'S DISEASE$30,000
COVENANT PLACE$25,000
CONGREGATION B'NAI AMOONA$25,000
ST LOUIS KOLLEL$25,000
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$25,000
NEW MT SINAI CEMETERY$25,000
CHABAD OF GREATER ST LOUIS$5,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$5,000
MINDSEYE RADIO$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $745k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MINDSEYE RADIO: $2k → 16%LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES: $20k → 11%MINDSEYE RADIO: $2k → 16%MINDSEYE RADIO: $2k → 16%MINDSEYE RADIO: $2k → 16%MINDSEYE RADIO: $2k → 16%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $344k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $101k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $50k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $40k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $35k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 11 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$4.6M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+49%

Still filing today

45%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $489k · revenue +20%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $226k · revenue +22%
  • MR
    MindsEye Radio
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT
    one grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +11%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +49%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
2
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
3
Council Apartments Ii Inc

Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…

Housing & Shelter
4
Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City

To sustain and enhance jewish life at home and around the world.

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
6
Council Apartments Inc

Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…

Housing & Shelter
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
9
Jazz St Louis

Jazz st louis is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to lead our community in advancing the uniquely american art of jazz through performance, education, and community engagement.

Arts & Culture
10
Minnesota Jewish Community Center

The minnesota jcc is dedicated to strengthening our community by providing inclusive programs that inspire personal growth, foster connection, and promote well-being through arts, culture, education, fitness, early childhood, day camp and…

11
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
12
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center and the most unlike its peers is MindsEye Radio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COVENANT PLACE — $2,124,999 · OtherCOVENANT PLACEGREATER ST LOUIS CHAPTER AMERICAN PARKINSON'S DISEASE — $135,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS — $107,200 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI AMOONA — $100,000 · Other+7 more — $202,500 · Other+7 moreTHE CROWN CENTER INC — $1,265,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE CROWN CENTER INCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $489,195 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY …JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS — $225,662 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SER…+2 more — $30,000 · Human ServicesSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $89,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,669,699Housing & Shelter$1,265,000Human Services$744,857Arts & Culture$89,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CROWN CENTER INC — $1,265,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $489,195 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS — $225,662 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $89,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT — $23,350 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMindsEye Radio — $10,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CROWN CENTER INC
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds ST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES
  • Who funds MindsEye Radio
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Chod Family Foundation · Harvey Kornblum Foundation · Millstone Foundation · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Jewish Federation of St Louis · Sidney & Bobette Guller Family Foundation · Kahn Memorial Trust · Gallop Family Foundation · Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundation · The Patriot Foundation · Harlene & Marvin Wool Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jca Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jca Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jca Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph