Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jayhawk Area Agency on Aging Inc

The goal is to foster independence, seeking to change the conditions that pose barriers for those who wish to remain a strong and vital part of the community.

$65k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Food & Nutrition$4.5MHuman Services$1.0MHealth$251kHousing & Shelter$249kCommunity Improvement$145kCrime & Legal$63kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kEmployment$26kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$64,911
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$64,911
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $384k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING: $31k → 14%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING: $27k → 14%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING: $22k → 14%EAST TOPEKA COUNCIL ON AGING: $20k → 14%Senior Resource Center of Dg County: $121k → 15%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER OF DG COUNTY: $114k → 15%TOPEKA LULAC SENIOR CENTER: $16k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 14%TOPEKA LULAC SENIOR CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 25 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 24 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
6

Total granted

$6.2M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+3%

Still filing today

36%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LAWRENCE MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $342k · revenue +39% · 34% of their budget
  • TH
    TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $204k · revenue +34%
  • JC
    JEFFERSON COUNTY SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $145k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • LH
    LAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue +3%
  • CB
    CENTURY BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES
    one grant, 2020 · $26k
  • RC
    Rose's Cafe
    one grant, 2017 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Southwest Kansas Area Agency on Aging Inc

To serve and enhance the lives of older people and their families in Southwest Kansas.

3
Tonganoxie Senior Citizens Donna Wiley
Housing & Shelter
4
East Central Kansas Area Agency On Aging

Provide services and meals to the elderly and disabled

5
Platte Senior Services Inc

Provide meals,transportation and social interaction opportunities for senior citizens living in platte county missouri

Human Services
6
Osage County Council On Aging Inc

To provide elderly residents of osage county, kansas with such services as they may from time to time require or find desirable and which, because of their age, they cannot provide themselves and which ought to be provided as economically…

Human Services
7
Lawrence Community Shelter Inc

The lawrence community shelter is the only emergency homeless shelter serving lawrence and douglas county in kansas. our mission is to provide a safe shelter and comprehensive services and programs in order to set people experiencing or at…

Housing & Shelter
8
Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency

The mission of Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency (the Organization) is to provide and promote the highest quality transit services to the Flint Hills communities.

9
Seward County Council On Aging Inc

None

Human Services
10
Kansas Affordable Housing Corporation

Provide support for mennonite housing rehabilitation services, inc., which provides low-income housing for the elderly and disabled through hud housing programs that provide low-income families with ownership opportunities and the…

Housing & Shelter
11
Lutheran Senior Citizens Inc

Concordia life plan community is a not-for-profit lutheran organization committed to upholding christian values while meeting the current and continuing needs of seniors of all beliefs in a safe, secure, and caring environment.

Housing & Shelter
12
Mid-America Nutrition Program Inc

Provides meals to persons over age 60 either at congregate locations or home delivered in several east central kansas counties.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lawrence Meals On Wheels Inc and the most unlike its peers is Topeka Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN KANSAS INC — $2,556,880 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN KANSAS INCMOM'S MEALS - PUR FOODS LLC — $348,060 · OtherMOM'S MEALS - PUR FOODS LLCLAWRENCE HY-VEE ON 6TH — $308,994 · OtherLAWRENCE HY-VEE ON 6THTOPEKA HY-VEE — $304,152 · OtherTOPEKA HY-VEEA HELPING HAND HOME CARE — $286,860 · OtherADVANTAGED HOME CARE INC — $267,827 · OtherDILLONS GROCERY STORES — $238,418 · OtherTOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $204,362 · Other+18 more — $1,036,502 · Other+18 moreSENIOR RESOURCE CENTER FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY INC — $234,535 · Human ServicesEast Topeka Council on Aging Inc — $100,434 · Human ServicesTOPEKA LULAC MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER INC — $49,175 · Human ServicesLAWRENCE MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $341,553 · Food & NutritionLAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $44,638 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,552,055Human Services$384,144Food & Nutrition$341,553Housing & Shelter$44,638

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN KANSAS INC — $2,556,880 over 4y, 40% of budgetLAWRENCE MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $341,553 over 4y, 34% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCE CENTER FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY INC — $234,535 over 2y, 12% of budgetTOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $204,362 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC — $145,210 over 4y, 16% of budgetTRINITY IN-HOME CARE INC — $102,650 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetEast Topeka Council on Aging Inc — $100,434 over 4y, 18% of budgetKANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC — $63,403 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTOPEKA LULAC MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER INC — $49,175 over 4y, 12% of budgetLAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $44,638 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF EASTERN KANSAS INC
  • Who funds LAWRENCE MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY INC
  • Who funds TOPEKA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC
  • Who funds TRINITY IN-HOME CARE INC
  • Who funds East Topeka Council on Aging Inc
  • Who funds PAPANS LANDING SENIOR CENTER INC
  • Who funds KANSAS LEGAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds TOPEKA LULAC MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER INC
  • Who funds LAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Topeka Community FoundationKS15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · United Way of Kaw Valley Inc · Douglas County Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jayhawk Area Agency on Aging Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph