Skip to content
Jannus Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Jannus Inc

Jannus, inc.

$10M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$11MHuman Services$7.9MEducation$3.1MCrime & Legal$1.0MCommunity Improvement$116k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $6,189,904, the rows itemized in this filing. The $10,260,649 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,070,745 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $469k
  • $250k+5 grants · $5.7M
$209,647
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$2,579,286
POLISHCHUK CONSULTING LLC$1,387,614
US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS$1,069,950
BOISE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS$329,452
WEST ADA JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT$304,746
TWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT$209,647
CHRISTENSEN LEGAL PLLC$196,616
SARA SKINNER$62,350
AFRICAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$24,292
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY$20,288
ATKIN IMMIGRATION LAW$5,663
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WEST ADA JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $305k → 8%COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO: $914k → 11%ATKIN IMMIGRATION LAW: $106k → 12%US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS: $1.1M → 7%WEST ADA JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $206k → 8%College of Southern Idaho: $529k → 11%ATKIN IMMIGRATION LAW: $45k → 12%WEST ADA JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $80k → 8%College of Southern Idaho: $506k → 11%West Ada Joint School District: $48k → 8%COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO: $499k → 11%COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO: $477k → 11%College of Southern Idaho: $423k → 11%College of Southern Idaho: $389k → 11%College of Southern Idaho: $294k → 11%CHRISTENSEN LEGAL PLLC: $250k → 8%TWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $210k → 11%CHRISTENSEN LEGAL PLLC: $225k → 8%TWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $156k → 11%IMMIGRANT JUSTICE OF IDAHO INC: $205k → 8%TWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $156k → 11%CHRISTENSEN LEGAL PLLC: $197k → 8%TWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $126k → 11%Twin Falls School District: $60k → 11%Twin Falls School District: $56k → 11%Twin Falls School District: $55k → 11%Twin Falls School District: $50k → 11%BOISE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS: $329k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $2.9M → 8%BOISE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS: $235k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $2.6M → 8%BOISE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS: $224k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $2.4M → 8%Boise Independent Schools: $122k → 8%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $916k → 8%Boise Independent Schools: $112k → 8%International Rescue Committee: $601k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF IDAHO: $109k → 8%International Rescue Committee: $551k → 8%Boise Independent Schools: $108k → 8%International Rescue Committee: $469k → 8%BOISE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS: $106k → 8%International Rescue Committee: $448k → 8%Boise Independent Schools: $93k → 8%Treasure Valley World Relief: $372k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF IDAHO: $46k → 8%International Rescue Committee: $295k → 8%SARA SKINNER: $62k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 14 repeat orgs$577k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$23M
$577k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+163%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +81%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +33%
  • EF
    Education Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $710k · revenue +154%

Funded once

  • WR
    WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $372k · revenue +163%
  • IJ
    Immigrant Justice Idaho
    one grant, 2023 · $205k · revenue 0% · 65% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
2
Idaho Hispanic Foundation Inc
Human Services
3
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
4
Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc
Health
5
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
6
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
7
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
8
Idaho State University Foundation Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to stimulate voluntary private support from alumni, parents, friends, corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of the University and its students.

Education
9
College of Western Idaho Foundation Inc

The Foundation, an Internal Revenue Code ("Code") Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, supports the mission of the College through the development and creation of resources that will improve and (Continued on Schedule O)(Continued…

Philanthropy
10
University of Idaho Foundation Inc

The mission of the University of Idaho Foundation, Inc. is to inspire, manage, and distribute private support to enhance the excellence of the University of Idaho.

Education
11
Idaho Catholic Foundation Inc

Needs of the diocese of boise by raising funds, holding and investing assets from the diocese and related catholic schools and parishes. the idaho catholic foundation fulfills its mission by:helping donors establish endowment funds…

—
12
Idaho Falls Fraternal Order of Police Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Us Committee for Refugees and Immigrants Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION: $4,031,522 · OtherCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATIONPOLISHCHUK CONSULTING LLC: $2,629,647 · OtherPOLISHCHUK CONSULTING LLCBOISE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS: $1,373,955 · OtherBOISE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLSUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $1,076,374 · OtherUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INCTWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 411 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $902,735 · OtherTWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 411 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCEducation Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc: $710,189 · OtherEducation Foundation For Joint School District #2 IncCHRISTENSEN LEGAL PLLC: $671,779 · OtherCHRISTENSEN LEGAL PLLC+5 more: $548,732 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INC: $11,090,645 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC+1 more: $372,029 · InternationalImmigrant Justice Idaho: $204,668 · Crime & LegalBoise State University Foundation Inc: $45,184 · Education
Other$11,944,933International$11,462,674Crime & Legal$204,668Education$45,184

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $11,090,645 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION: $4,031,522 over 8y, 22% of budgetUS COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $1,076,374 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 411 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $902,735 over 9y, 91% of budgetEducation Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc: $710,189 over 8y, 22% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $372,029 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetImmigrant Justice Idaho: $204,668 over 1y, 65% of budgetCatholic Charities of Idaho: $155,395 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc: $45,184 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 411 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Education Foundation For Joint School District #2 Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds Immigrant Justice Idaho ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Idaho ↗
  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Found…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Idaho Community Foundation IncID15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jannus Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jannus Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 53% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jannus Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jannus Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jannus’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home