Skip to content
Janice L Burgette Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Janice L Burgette Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$330k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$450kArts & Culture$195kHuman Services$100kEducation$50kFood & Nutrition$45kAnimals$30kReligion$25k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VISITING NURSE & HOSPICE HOME INC$75,000
COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK$25,000
FORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA$25,000
IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$25,000
SUPER SHOT INC$25,000
RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED$25,000
TURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND A$25,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN INC$25,000
EMBASSY THEATRE FOUNDATION$25,000
MATTHEW 25 INC$15,000
ST MARY MOTHER OF GOD CATHOLIC CHUR$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK: $25k → 12%SCAN: $25k → 12%IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$670k · 11 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$670k
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
0%

Still filing today

82%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FW
    FORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +124%
  • SS
    Super Shot Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +12%
  • IF
    IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • SH
    STILLWATER HOSPICE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CT
    COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +13%
  • TC
    TURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
2
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
4
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
5
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
6
Our Hospice of South Central Indiana Inc

Our hospice of south central indiana, inc. (ohsci) is an independent, not-for-profit organization providing services to the terminally ill in a 22-county service area. since its inception 44 years ago, hospice has expanded to meet the…

Human Services
7
Indiana Health Centers Inc

Improving the health status of the community at large with special emphasis on those who, because of their poverty, location in rural areas, or for other reasons, have health needs which are not being properly addressed.

Health
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Marion General Hospital Inc

Marion general hospital exists to transform the health of our community through patient-centered, high quality, affordable care. best practices by leading a collaborative approach involving physicians, staff, business leaders and our…

Health
10
Indiana University Health Arnett Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Freeport Memorial Hospital

Our mission is to improve the health of our communities, working together with those we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turnstone Center for Children & Adults With Disabilities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Professional Animal Retirement Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VISITING NURSE & HOSPICE HOME INC: $125,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE & HOSPICE HOME INCSuper Shot Inc: $60,000 · HealthSuper Shot IncSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENMATTHEW 25 INC: $40,000 · HealthMATTHEW 25 INCTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $25,000 · HealthTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULT…AUDIENCES UNLIMITED INC: $60,000 · OtherAUDIENCES UNLIMITED INCSTILLWATER HOSPICE: $50,000 · OtherSTILLWATER HOSPICEMATTHEW 25 HEALTH & CARE: $50,000 · OtherMATTHEW 25 HEALTH & CARERILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND A: $25,000 · OtherTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND …ST MARY MOTHER OF GOD CATHOLIC CHUR: $15,000 · OtherST MARY MOTHER OF GOD CATHOLIC CHU…ST MARY MOTHER OF GOD CATHOLIC: $10,000 · OtherHomebound Meals Inc: $10,000 · OtherFORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WAYNE PHILHA…EMBASSY THEATRE FOUNDATIONINC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureEMBASSY THEATRE F…The Allen County Courthouse Preservation Trust Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe Allen County …IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesIRIS FAMI…COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $50,000 · ReligionCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionPROFESSIONAL ANIMAL RETIREMENT CENTER INC: $20,000 · AnimalsFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Animals
Health$300,000Other$270,000Arts & Culture$135,000Human Services$75,000Religion$50,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Animals$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVISITING NURSE & HOSPICE HOME INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSuper Shot Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAUDIENCES UNLIMITED INC: $60,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATTHEW 25 INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEMBASSY THEATRE FOUNDATIONINC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROFESSIONAL ANIMAL RETIREMENT CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Allen County Courthouse Preservation Trust Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHomebound Meals Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Financial Fou…Edward M Wilson Found…The Waterfield Founda…English-Bonter-Mitche…Journal Gazette Found…Howard P Arnold Found…O'Rourke Schof Family…Magee-O'Connor Founda…Edward D & Ione Auer …M E Raker Foundation …The James Foundation …Aws Foundation Inc
Lincoln Financial Foundation IncPA30.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Journal Gazette Foundation Inc · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc · O'Rourke Schof Family Foundation · Magee-O'Connor Foundation Inc I/C/O Mr Douglas E Miller · Edward D & Ione Auer Foundation Monarch Capital David Meyer Trustee · M E Raker Foundation Inc · The James Foundation Inc · Aws Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Janice L Burgette Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Janice L Burgette Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Janice L Burgette’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home