Skip to content
Jammy Heal Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jammy Heal Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$17kHealth$14kYouth Development$13kAnimals$13kCivil Rights$10kEnvironment$8kScience & Tech$3k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$38k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDCOAST WATERSHEDS COUNCIL$2,500
THE WETLANDS CONSERVANCY$2,500
SQUASH ON TRACK$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SQUASH ON TRACK: $4k → 7%ESCALADE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%MA CENTER: $12k → 9%THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%RESILIENCE BIRTHRIGHT INC: $3k → 10%THE WETLANDS CONSERVANCY: $3k → 12%MIDCOAST WATERSHEDS COUNCIL: $3k → 16%GREAT WHALE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 15%SOUND SCIENCE RESEARCH COLLECTIVE: $3k → 8%CONFLICT AWARENESS PROJECT: $10k → 12%SQUASH ON TRACK: $4k → 7%ESCALADE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%MA CENTER: $5k → 9%OREGON COAST AQUARIUM: $3k → 16%SQUASH ON TRACK: $4k → 7%ESCALADE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%SQUASH ON TRACK: $2k → 7%ESCALADE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%SQUASH ON TRACK: $1k → 7%ESCALADE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%SQUASH ON TRACK: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 3 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1408% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$46k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1408%
-18%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $17k
  • SO
    SQUASH ON TRACK
    6× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue ×15
  • ER
    ESCALADE RECOVERY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue -78%

Funded once

  • GW
    GREAT WHALE CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +549%
  • CA
    Conflict Awareness Project
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -56%
  • TS
    THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orca Conservancy

Orca conservancy is working on behalf of orcinus orca, the killer whale, and protecting the wild places on which it depends.

Animals
2
Center for Whale Research

The center for whale research (cwr) is dedicated to the study and conservation of the pacific northwests killer whale populations, with a primary focus on the critically endangered southern resident killer whales. building on half a…

Science & Tech
3
Galapagos Whale Shark Project
—
4
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
5
Wild Orca

Translating science into action to save Southern Resident killer whales from extinction.

Animals
6
Ocean Alliance Project

Protecting and promoting the marine biodiversity of Hawai'i through coral restoration, ecological monitoring, regenerative tourism, and cultural integration

Science & Tech
7
Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition

Oregon shores helps citizens and visitors learn about, enjoy and defend the oregon coast through natural history education and conservation action.

—
8
Alaska Wildlife Alliance

Support ecosystem-based wildlife management by increasing public awareness of wildlife issues, responding to information requests, advocating for science-based wildlife habitat management through proposal and comment submissions, and…

Environment
9
Clean Reefs
Environment
10
Coastal Conservation & Research

Provide scientific, environmental research and education for environmental conservation, preservation, restoration, recycling, and environmental planning

Environment
11
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
12
Wild Salmon Rivers

To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midcoast Watersheds Council; the most unlike its peers is Conflict Awareness Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI CENTER: $17,000 · OtherMATA AMRITANANDAMAYI CENTERRESILIENCE BIRTHRIGHT INC: $2,500 · OtherRESILIENCE BIRTHRIGHT INCSOUND SCIENCE RESEARCH COLLECTIVE: $2,500 · OtherSOUND SCIENCE RESEARCH COLLECT…SQUASH ON TRACK: $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentSQUASH ON TRACKESCALADE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthESCALADE RECOVERY F…GREAT WHALE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · AnimalsGREAT WHALE CONSE…OREGON COAST AQUARIUM INC: $2,500 · AnimalsOREGON COAST AQUA…Conflict Awareness Project: $10,000 · Civil RightsConflict Awar…THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER…The Wetlands Conservancy Inc: $2,500 · EnvironmentThe Wetlands …MIDCOAST WATERSHEDS COUNCIL: $2,500 · EnvironmentMIDCOAST WATE…
Other$22,000Youth Development$14,500Health$14,000Animals$12,500Civil Rights$10,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSQUASH ON TRACK: $14,500 over 6y, 18% of budgetESCALADE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetGREAT WHALE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetConflict Awareness Project: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Wetlands Conservancy Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON COAST AQUARIUM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDCOAST WATERSHEDS COUNCIL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jammy Heal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jammy Heal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc: 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jammy Heal’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home