Skip to content

· Private foundation

James Lessing Kleeblatt Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$156kHousing & Shelter$105kArts & Culture$35kReligion$30kHuman Services$23kHealth$13kAnimals$3kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$190k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$30,000
PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
WINDY HILL FOUNDATION$5,000
PARAGON PHILHARMONIA$5,000
MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
A PLACE TO BE$1,000
MIDDLEBURG LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD$500
THE PLAINS COMMUNITY LEAGUE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 4%SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES: $250 → 4%SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES: $250 → 4%SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES: $250 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$406k · 14 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$406k
$13k

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
    8× · 2017–2026 · $186k · revenue +161%
  • WH
    WINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2026 · $100k · revenue +101%
  • MC
    MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2026 · $23k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUND
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • LF
    LITTLE FORK PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2025 · $3k
  • TM
    THE MIDDLEBURG LIBRARY ADVISORY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Middletown Public Library

provide public library services to the local community

Health
2
The Mountain Playhouse

Offering the people of rural south-western pennsylvania live professional theatre producing eight or nine shows per summer of selected comedies, dramas, and musicals.

Arts & Culture
3
Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education
4
Lynchburg Symphony Orchestra Inc

The organizations mission is to enrich lives and connect the community through opportunities to experience beautiful and high-quality symphonic music with a vision that the organization is a vibrant and integral leader of the Lynchburg,…

Arts & Culture
5
Monticello Opera House Inc

Bringing art and culture to the community

Arts & Culture
6
The Piedmont Arts Association

To provide experiences in the visual and performing arts

—
7
Paducah Symphony Orchestra Inc

To enhance the appreciation of music for area citizens and to enhance the cultural reputation of the region.

—
8
Middlebury Community Tv

Custodian of the public educational and governmental need of community: Provide training, education and equipment for local video production; providing an accessible communication medium.

Arts & Culture
9
The Millicent Library

Public lending library

Education
10
Middlebury Food Pantry

Cultivating dignity and hope together.

Food & Nutrition
11
Middleton Food Pantry Inc

Gather food and distribute it to needy families

Food & Nutrition
12
Seven Hills Chamber Music

Provide free chamber music concerts in Lynchburg Virginia

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Place to Be; the most unlike its peers is Paragon Philharmonia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $186,000 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCILWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INCGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $27,500 · OtherGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCHMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $22,500 · OtherMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INCA PLACE TO BE: $14,000 · OtherA PLACE TO BENORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUND: $10,000 · OtherNORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUND+6 more: $7,500 · OtherPIEDMONT REGIONAL ORCHESTRA DBA PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $37,500 · PhilanthropyPIEDMONT R…PARAGON PHILHARMONIA: $7,500 · Arts & CultureMIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION: $3,300 · AnimalsSeven Loaves Services Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesMIDDLEBURG FISH: $1,250 · Human ServicesTHE PLAINS COMMUNITY LEAGUE: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Environment$186,000Other$181,500Philanthropy$37,500Arts & Culture$7,500Animals$3,300Human Services$2,750Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $186,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetPIEDMONT REGIONAL ORCHESTRA DBA PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $37,500 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetA PLACE TO BE: $14,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPARAGON PHILHARMONIA: $7,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION: $3,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSeven Loaves Services Inc: $1,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLEBURG FISH: $1,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PLAINS COMMUNITY LEAGUE: $1,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT REGIONAL ORCHESTRA DBA PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE TO BE ↗
  • Who funds PARAGON PHILHARMONIA ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Seven Loaves Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG FISH ↗
  • Who funds THE PLAINS COMMUNITY LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Luminescence Foundation IncVA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Luminescence Foundation Inc · McGraw Foundation · The Anna McWane Charitable Foundation · Wise Foundation · The Van Metre Family Foundation Inc · MRC Full Circle Foundation · Graham Foundation Inc · Frank Mangano Foundation · Louise B Cochrane Charitable Founda · Dun Foundation · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James Lessing Kleeblatt Memorial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James Lessing Kleeblatt Memorial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James Lessing Kleeblatt Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph