Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James Lessing Kleeblatt Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of JAMES LESSING KLEEBLATT MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$30,000
WINDY HILL FOUNDATION$5,000
PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
LITTLE FORK PRESERVATION COMMITTEE$2,500
PARAGON PHILHARMONIA$2,500
A PLACE TO BE$1,000
SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES INC$500
MIDDLEBURG LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD$500
THE PLAINS COMMUNITY LEAGUE$250
MIDDLEBURG FISH$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $750) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 4%SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES: $250 → 4%SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES: $250 → 4%SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES: $250 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$355k · 13 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$355k
$11k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $156k · revenue +161%
  • WH
    WINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +101%
  • MC
    MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUND
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TM
    THE MIDDLEBURG LIBRARY ADVISORY
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • TM
    THE MIDDLEBURG LIRARY ADVISOR
    one grant, 2019 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Middletown Public Library

provide public library services to the local community

Health
2
The Mountain Playhouse

Offering the people of rural south-western pennsylvania live professional theatre producing eight or nine shows per summer of selected comedies, dramas, and musicals.

Arts & Culture
3
Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education
4
Lynchburg Symphony Orchestra Inc

The organizations mission is to enrich lives and connect the community through opportunities to experience beautiful and high-quality symphonic music with a vision that the organization is a vibrant and integral leader of the Lynchburg,…

Arts & Culture
5
Monticello Opera House Inc

Bringing art and culture to the community

Arts & Culture
6
The Piedmont Arts Association

To provide experiences in the visual and performing arts

7
Paducah Symphony Orchestra Inc

To enhance the appreciation of music for area citizens and to enhance the cultural reputation of the region.

8
Seven Hills Chamber Music

Provide free chamber music concerts in Lynchburg Virginia

Arts & Culture
9
Middlebury Community Tv

Custodian of the public educational and governmental need of community: Provide training, education and equipment for local video production; providing an accessible communication medium.

Arts & Culture
10
Middleton Community Orchestra

The Middleton Community Orchestra is an amateur orchestra comprised of proficient musicians who are dedicated to the playing and performance of classical intrumental music

Arts & Culture
11
Middleton Food Pantry Inc

Gather food and distribute it to needy families

Food & Nutrition
12
Paramount Center Inc

Operated a community based performing arts center through production of a wide variety of theatrical performances and provided the theatre facility for use by other community organizations to provide education and increased exposure to the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Place to Be and the most unlike its peers is Paragon Philharmonia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC — $95,000 · OtherWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INCGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $27,500 · OtherGRACE EPISCOPAL CHURCHMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $20,000 · OtherMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INCA PLACE TO BE — $13,000 · OtherA PLACE TO BENORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUND — $10,000 · OtherNORTHERN PIEDMONT COMMUNITY FOUND+6 more — $7,000 · OtherTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $156,000 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCILPIEDMONT REGIONAL ORCHESTRA DBA PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $32,500 · PhilanthropyPIEDMONT …MIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION — $3,300 · AnimalsSeven Loaves Services Inc — $1,500 · Human ServicesMIDDLEBURG FISH — $1,250 · Human ServicesPARAGON PHILHARMONIA — $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE PLAINS COMMUNITY LEAGUE — $750 · Community Improvement
Other$172,500Environment$156,000Philanthropy$32,500Animals$3,300Human Services$2,750Arts & Culture$2,500Community Improvement$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $156,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetWINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC — $95,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetPIEDMONT REGIONAL ORCHESTRA DBA PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $32,500 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetMIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $20,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetA PLACE TO BE — $13,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION — $3,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARAGON PHILHARMONIA — $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSeven Loaves Services Inc — $1,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLEBURG FISH — $1,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PLAINS COMMUNITY LEAGUE — $750 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
  • Who funds WINDY HILL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PIEDMONT REGIONAL ORCHESTRA DBA PIEDMONT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds A PLACE TO BE
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARAGON PHILHARMONIA
  • Who funds Seven Loaves Services Inc
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG FISH
  • Who funds THE PLAINS COMMUNITY LEAGUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Luminescence Foundation IncVA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Luminescence Foundation Inc · McGraw Foundation · The Anna McWane Charitable Foundation · Wise Foundation · The Van Metre Family Foundation Inc · MRC Full Circle Foundation · Graham Foundation Inc · Frank Mangano Foundation · Louise B Cochrane Charitable Founda · Dun Foundation · Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James Lessing Kleeblatt Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph