Skip to content

· Private foundation

James E & Lillian E Shea Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$86kFood & Nutrition$11kAnimals$11kArts & Culture$8kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$7kHuman Services$5kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$275k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUTH OR CALE BAUS$3,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC$2,500
LORD'S CUPBOARD$2,500
TWIN CITY CLOTHING CENTER$2,000
TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER$2,000
RICK OR JOLENE TINNEL$1,000
DEREK OR COURTNEY ENSTAD$1,000
LEAD DEADWOOD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
NORTHERN HILLS AREA CASA PROGRAM$1,000
BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$1,000
TEEN COURT$1,000
ADAMS MUSEUM AND HOUSE$1,000
HISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ADAMS MUSEUM AND HOUSE: $2k → 11%NEIGHBOR WORKS: $2k → 11%TEEN COURT: $2k → 11%RICK OR JOLENE TINNEL: $1k → 11%TEEN COURT: $1k → 11%TEEN COURT: $1k → 11%ADAMS MUSEUM AND HOUSE: $1k → 11%TEEN COURT: $1k → 11%NEIGHBOR WORKS: $1k → 11%ADAMS MUSEUM AND HOUSE: $1k → 11%NEIGHBOR WORKS: $1k → 11%ADAMS MUSEUM AND HOUSE: $1k → 11%TEEN COURT: $1k → 11%NEIGHBOR WORKS: $1k → 11%NEIGHBOR WORKS: $1k → 11%ADAMS MUSEUM AND HOUSE: $1k → 11%RUTH OR CALE BAUS: $3k → 11%LORD'S CUPBOARD: $3k → 11%TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 11%TWIN CITY CLOTHING CENTER: $2k → 11%TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 11%LORD'S CUPBOARD: $2k → 11%TWIN CITY CLOTHING CENTER: $2k → 11%TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 11%LORD'S CUPBOARD: $2k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $3k → 11%LORD'S CUPBOARD: $2k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $2k → 11%TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 11%BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 11%LORD'S CUPBOARD: $2k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $2k → 11%TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $2k → 11%LEAD DEADWOOD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 11%TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 11%DEREK OR COURTNEY ENSTAD: $1k → 11%LORD'S CUPBOARD: $1k → 11%BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%HISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE: $1k → 11%BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%LORD'S CUPBOARD: $1k → 11%BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%LEAD DEADWOOD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $1k → 11%TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 11%BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 10 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
23

Total granted

$91k
$39k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +57%
  • BP
    BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER
    6× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +59%
  • TC
    TEEN COURT
    7× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +249%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IN
    INDIVIDUALS NOT OVER 1000
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIVIDUALS NOT OVER 1500: $28,100 · OtherINDIVIDUALS NOT OVER 1500TWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTER: $10,500 · OtherTWIN CITY ANIMAL SHELTERNEIGHBOR WORKS: $5,500 · OtherNEIGHBOR WORKSTWIN CITY CLOTHING CENTER: $4,500 · Other+27 more: $45,600 · Other+27 moreGOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $8,500 · HealthGOOD SHEPHERD…BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $7,500 · HealthBELLA PREGNAN…LORDS CUPBOARD: $11,000 · Food & NutritionLORDS CUP…ADAMS MUSEUM & HOUSE INC: $6,800 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTEEN COURT: $6,500 · Crime & LegalNORTHERN HILLS AREA CASA PROGRAM: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$94,200Health$16,000Food & Nutrition$11,000Arts & Culture$7,800Crime & Legal$6,500Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLORDS CUPBOARD: $11,000 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $8,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetBELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $7,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetADAMS MUSEUM & HOUSE INC: $6,800 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTEEN COURT: $6,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetHISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN HILLS AREA CASA PROGRAM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LORDS CUPBOARD ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLA PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ADAMS MUSEUM & HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN COURT ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN HILLS AREA CASA PROGRAM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Walter & Frances Green Charitable TrustMT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walter & Frances Green Charitable Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James E & Lillian E Shea Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James E & Lillian E Shea Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James E & Lillian E Shea Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to James E & Lillian E Shea Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James E & Lillian E Shea’s filings →

    More from the funding graph