Skip to content

· Private foundation

James and Joyce Giles Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$106kEducation$80kEnvironment$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kRecreation & Sports$10kPublic Benefit$10kAnimals$6kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUSAN G KOMEN FOUNDATION$10,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - LOMBARDI$10,000
BALTIMORE CIVIC FUND - KEY BRIDGE$10,000
SEVERN SCHOOL - PROMISE CAMPAIGN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 3 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +392% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$125k
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+392%
-4%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationEnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $55k · revenue +392%
  • CN
    CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDA
    3× · 2021–2023 · $37k
  • TS
    The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
    3× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AT
    ALLIANCE TO RESTORE NORTHWEST CREEK
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +78%
  • AK
    AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
7
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
8
American Heart Association Inc

The american heart association's mission is to be a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives.

Health
9
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
10
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
11
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Severn School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDA: $37,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDAALLIANCE TO RESTORE NORTHWEST CREEK: $25,000 · OtherALLIANCE TO RESTORE NORTHWEST CREEKBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND - KEY BRIDGE: $10,000 · OtherBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND - KEY BRIDGEAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INCUMCP FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherUMCP FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - LOMBARDI: $10,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - LOMBARDIAMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH: $6,000 · OtherSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWE…SEVERN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · EducationSEVERN SCHOOL INCTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC: $5,000 · EducationTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HO…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $33,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEA…AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIO…LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDA…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,500 · International
Other$118,000Education$70,000Health$59,000Human Services$10,000Environment$10,000International$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $33,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEVERN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James and Joyce Giles Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James and Joyce Giles Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James and Joyce Giles Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James and Joyce Giles Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James and Joyce Giles’ filings →

    More from the funding graph