Skip to content
Jagadeesh Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jagadeesh Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$178kPublic Benefit$143kFood & Nutrition$105kInternational$68kEducation$50kYouth Development$46kHealth$44kPhilanthropy$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SRCF$4,008
ASSOCIATION OF KANNADA KOOTAS OF AMERICA (AKKA)$2,500
SIDDHI VINAYAK TEMPLE$1,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%H2H FOUNDATION: $165k → 8%H2H FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%GLOBAL ORGANIZATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 10%AINAK: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$597k · 20 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
29

Total granted

$597k
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+19%

Still filing today

45%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2023 · $105k · revenue +239%
  • SS
    Sri Shankara Cancer Foundation USA
    3× · 2019–2021 · $40k · revenue +7%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
    3× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • SG
    SAI GLOBAL MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue +19%
  • KK
    KANNADA KOTA OF NOR CAL
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Satyagraha Foundation
Religion
2
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Iisc Foundation

The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…

Education
4
Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Sahayog Foundation
Community Improvement
6
Ashra Charitable Fund Inc

Provide financial assistance to orphanages,old-age homes, provide educational scholarships to orphans, arrange health camps and food drives for orphanages and old-age homes.

International
7
Shraman Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
9
Sai Spiritual Foundation

Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba

Religion
10
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
11
Global Hindu Heritage Foundation

GHHF has 175 Sunday School centers India .Grants were give for education, reconstruction and renovation of Hindu Temples. Provided vocational training for underpriviledged. Provided free meals to needy. Flood relief, medicines and baby…

Religion
12
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa); the most unlike its peers is H2H Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SVCC: $57,808 · OtherSVCCOSAAT: $45,000 · OtherOSAATOSAAT (ONE SCHOOL AT A TIME): $27,029 · OtherOSAAT (ONE SCHOOL AT A TIME)KANNADA KOTA OF NOR CAL: $25,000 · OtherKANNADA KOTA OF NOR CALSRCF: $24,380 · OtherSRCFBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $20,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBTHE AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherSUJNANA RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $14,010 · OtherSANATANA DHARMA KENDRA: $11,952 · OtherONE SCHOOL AT A TIME INC: $15,000 · Other+26 more: $81,379 · Other+26 moreH2H FOUNDATION: $167,000 · Human ServicesH2H FOUNDATION+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $105,000 · Food & NutritionAKSHAYA PATRA F…SAI GLOBAL MISSION: $45,000 · InternationalSAI GLOBAL…VIBHA INC AKA HELP THEM GROW: $12,500 · InternationalVIBHA INC …INDIA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $9,001 · InternationalINDIA COMM…INDIA LITERACY PROJECT: $4,100 · InternationalINDIA LITE…+2 more: $1,501 · InternationalSri Shankara Cancer Foundation USA: $40,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR PROMOTION OF SPORTS AND GAMES: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $501 · Recreation & Sports
Other$336,558Human Services$168,500Food & Nutrition$105,000International$72,102Health$41,000Youth Development$26,000Recreation & Sports$25,501

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $105,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAI GLOBAL MISSION: $45,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSri Shankara Cancer Foundation USA: $40,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR PROMOTION OF SPORTS AND GAMES: $25,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetONE SCHOOL AT A TIME INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetVIBHA INC AKA HELP THEM GROW: $12,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetINDIA HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,926 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINDIA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $9,001 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIA LITERACY PROJECT: $4,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCARNATICA ARCHIVAL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $3,125 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL ARTS PERFORMING CENTER INC: $2,545 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF KANNADA KOOTAS OF AMERICA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSRI KAMAKSHI COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,302 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $1,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILANA-MILWAUKEE KANNADA KOOTA: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGLOBAL ORGANIZATION FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTOUCH A LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetYoga Bharati: $501 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCODEORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAINAK: $500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds SAI GLOBAL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Sri Shankara Cancer Foundation USA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PROMOTION OF SPORTS AND GAMES ↗
  • Who funds ONE SCHOOL AT A TIME INC ↗
  • Who funds VIBHA INC AKA HELP THEM GROW ↗
  • Who funds INDIA HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIA LITERACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CARNATICA ARCHIVAL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL ARTS PERFORMING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF KANNADA KOOTAS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SRI KAMAKSHI COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bright Funds Foundati…The Intuit FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Sita FoundationMcKesson Foundation I…American Express Foun…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…United Way Worldwide
Bright Funds FoundationCA28.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bright Funds Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Sita Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · American Express Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jagadeesh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jagadeesh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jagadeesh Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jagadeesh Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jagadeesh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home