Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jafis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$55kEducation$52kHealth$10kHuman Services$5kInternational$5kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$3,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY$26,000
AISH GLOBAL$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,600
CONGREGATION BNAI YESHURN$7,275
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA ATERET CHANIM$7,000
JUST ONE LIFE$5,000
LEV ACHAD$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,600
ROV MOSHE FOUNDATION$3,600
BEIS MIDRASH OF QUEENS$1,800
FUND INTL$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
GATES OF ZION$1,800
DAILY GIVING$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA ATERET CHANIM: $7k → 6%GATES OF ZION: $2k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%MESIFTA CHAIM BERLIN: $2k → 20%LEV ACHAD: $5k → 7%CONGREGATION ISRAEL: $1k → 10%AISH GLOBAL: $20k → 12%ROV MOSHE FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%EMUNAH WOMEN AMER: $2k → 17%YESHIVATH NOAM: $10k → 7%ROV MOSHE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%MESIFTA STATEN ISLAND: $9k → 17%SINAI SCHOOLS PARAMUS NJ: $7k → 7%MESIFTA TIFERETH JERUSALEM: $4k → 17%TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $10k → 7%BEIS MIDRASH OF QUEENS: $2k → 17%CONGREGATION BNAI YESHURN: $7k → 7%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $26k → 17%FUND INTL: $2k → 7%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%DAILY GIVING: $2k → 7%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%DAILY GIVING: $2k → 7%JUST ONE LIFE: $5k → 17%OHR TORAH INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Baltimore Torah School Inc

The mission of baltimore torah school, inc., a boys school for grades 8- 12, is to produce young men who are motivated to find satisfaction and joy in learning and serving g-d, capable of advancing to excellent advanced jewish study…

Education
6
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
7
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
8
Yeshivat Ohel Torah

To conduct a school for Hebrew religious education

Religion
9
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
11
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
12
Yeshivas Ohr Yissochor Academy Inc

To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aish Global Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTYAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $8,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION BNAI YESHURUN: $7,275 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI YESHURUNSINAI SCHOOLS PARAMUS NJ: $7,000 · OtherSINAI SCHOOLS PARAMUS NJAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA ATERET CHANIM: $7,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA ATERET CHANIMROV MOSHE FOUNDATION: $4,100 · OtherROV MOSHE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $3,600 · OtherOHR TORAH INSTITUTE: $3,000 · Other+6 more: $10,170 · Other+6 moreYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITYYESHIVAT NOAM: $10,000 · EducationYESHIVAT NOAMAISH GLOBAL INC: $20,000 · ReligionAISH GLOBAL INCLEV ECHAD INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyDAILY GIVING INC: $3,300 · PhilanthropyJUST ONE LIFE INC: $5,000 · International
Other$70,745Education$45,000Religion$20,000Philanthropy$8,300International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT NOAM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AISH GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT NOAM ↗
  • Who funds TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds JUST ONE LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEV ECHAD INC ↗
  • Who funds DAILY GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds Beis Midrash of Queens ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation · Fjc · Daniel and Miriam Michael Foundation · M D Katz Foundation Inc · Granit Foundation · Stephen and Regina Savitsky Foundation · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · Houston Jewish Community Foundation · The Ojc Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jafis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jafis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Torah Academy of Bergen County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jafis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jafis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jafis’ filings →

More from the funding graph