How much did JACOBS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of JACOBS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

indian river

2019

indian riverchildren's

2020

churchindian riverchildren's

2021

—

2022

indian riverchildren's

2023

indian

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k18 grants · $10k
$10k–50k1 grant · $11k

$500

Median grant

States reached

$151k

Total assets

Largest grants

COMMUNITY CHURCH OF VERO BEACH$11,000
CAMP HAVEN INC$1,000
CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE$1,000
GRAND HARBOR COMMUNITY OUTREACH$1,000
INDIAN RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$900
GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER$700
UNITED AGAINST POVERTY$500
HOPE FOR FAMILIES$500
HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER$500
THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$500
SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE$500
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA$500
ST JOHN'S PREP$500
ACCELERATE CHANGE$500
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$80k · 27 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$80k

$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%

+73%

Still filing today

52%

19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GH
GRAND HARBOR COMMUNITY OUTREACH
8× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +82%
CM
CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE
4× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +50%
CH
CAMP HAVEN INC
5× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue +144%

Funded once

PG
PCOM GEORGIA
one grant, 2022 · $2k
EH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INDIAN RIVER C
one grant, 2019 · $2k
PF
PLUM FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Riverside Theatre Co

A great city deserves serious theatre.theatre that sparks discourse, builds community, delights, inspires, breaks down barriers, and explores the complexities of the human spirit. riverside theatre strengthens the cultural fabric of iowa…

Arts & Culture

Riverside Research Institute

The nature of its activities are to engage in and support scientific research.

Health

Venice Theatre Inc

Theatre arts education

Arts & Culture

University of California Riverside

To preserve and promote the relationship between ucr and all its alumni. through its various services and programs, the association represents alumni and assists the university in its quest for excellence.

Education

United States Park Police

Human Services

Vincent Crotty Memorial Foundation

The vincent crotty memorial foundation was formed in memory and spirit of vincent crotty and assists needy children and families as well as youth sports programs throughout suffern, new york and surrounding areas.

Recreation & Sports

Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education

Ross Valley Players

Ross valley players produces diverse, professional quality live theatre that evokes, entertains and enlivens the human spirit. we invite the participation of an evolving and expanding community. we provide an open, collaborative…

Arts & Culture

The Rivercity Company

The rivercity company's mission is to assist and support the chattanooga city and hamilton county governments by promoting and managing the development of a vibrant, attractive and healthy downtown that is the economic, social and cultural…

Community Improvement

Rio Vista Foundation

Philanthropy

Rivers Way Outdoor Adventure

—

Rio Grande Trails and Tales

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Veterans Council of Indian River Co and the most unlike its peers is Claremont McKenna College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/26

the rest of the field

14%

14,580/103,018

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/24

Grantees still filing

20/24

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$65,545Philanthropy$12,775Arts & Culture$3,050International$2,900Housing & Shelter$2,530Youth Development$2,150Health$1,375

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Indian River Community Foundation IncFL22.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc · The McCord Family Foundation Inc · Impact 100 of Indian River County · Quail Valley Charities Inc · United Way of Indian River County Inc · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JACOBS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GRAND HARBOR COMMUNITY OUTREACH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +82% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 510418002 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GRAND HARBOR COMMUNITY OUTREACH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jacobs Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jacobs Family Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JACOBS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jacobs Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

JACOBS FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jacobs Family Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph