How much did JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION reported 13 grants totaling $290,842 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION based?

JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION is based in WA.

JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$291k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$60k

Largest

01What you fund

0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Animals$1.6MHuman Services$952kYouth Development$154kEducation$121kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$4kArts & Culture$4kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$1.8M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

humane

2020

rowinghumane

2021

—

2022

windermerehumane

2023

humane

2024

humane

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $3k
$10k–50k9 grants · $227k
$50k–250k1 grant · $60k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$132k

Total assets

Largest grants

ASSISTANCE DOGS NORTHWEST$60,000
PAWS OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND$45,674
KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
MARY'S PLACE$25,000
VFW FOUNDATION$25,000
LANAI ANIMAL RESCUE CENTER$25,000
MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY$25,000
RYTHER$25,000
SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
PASADO'S SAFE HAVEN$11,728
SEATTLE TIMES FUND FOR THE NEEDY$2,140
SERVE WENATCHEE$1,000
BOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$300

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $952k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.3M · 25 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.3M

$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%

+40%

Still filing today

60%

28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

KH
KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY
4× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +4%
WF
WINDERMERE FOUNDATION
4× · 2017–2022 · $779k · revenue +11% · 25% of their budget
SV
SEATTLE VETERINARY OUTREACH
4× · 2019–2022 · $388k · revenue +156% · 56% of their budget

Funded once

UO
UNIVERSITY OF WA ATHLETICS
one grant, 2021 · $50k
MF
MONTLAKE FUTURES
one grant, 2023 · $50k
ASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAIIgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Peninsula Humane Society & Spca

To ensure humane treatment and quality of life for all animals.

Animals

Washington Humane Society

To protect animals in the district of columbia and new jersey from cruelty and harm.

Animals

Safe Harbor Animal Sanctuary

Animals

Seattle Animal Shelter Foundation

Seattle Animal Foundation (SAF), is on a mission to make sure every animal finds the love, care, and forever home they deserve. Since 2010, we have been a not-for-profit organization raising critical funds to support life-saving programs,…

Animals

The Humane Society for Seattleking

Animal welfare organization

Animals

North Bay Animal Services

Animals

Santa Cruz Co Animal Shelter Foundation

To support santa cruz county animal services authority through education, public awareness, fund raising, support of current projects, and establishment of new projects.

Animals

Furever Sunny

Animals

Bailey Animal Rescue Trust

Animals

Skyeward Bound Ranch

Handicapped children

Human Services

Habitat for Humanity of Washington

The organization's mission is to seek to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. habitat for humanity of washington county (hfhwc) is a nonprofit, ecumenical christian…

—

Beaverhead Animal Shelter

Beaverhead Animal Shelter is a no-kill shelter, with an open-door policy. There is no charge, nor judgment, if you need to drop off a stray that youve found, or a beloved pet that is no longer able to stay with its family, no matter the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bainbridge Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Room to Read. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/26

the rest of the field

13%

8,365/65,142

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/24

Grantees still filing

23/24

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,761,823Animals$1,560,828Human Services$951,511Youth Development$154,000Education$121,000Philanthropy$5,140Health$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA25.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Bainbridge Community Foundation · Real Progress Foundation · Windermere Foundation · Casey Family Programs · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · One Call for All · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · The Foster Foundation · Rotary Club of Bainbridge Island Trust · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SEATTLE VETERINARY OUTREACH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832653099 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SEATTLE VETERINARY OUTREACH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 56% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jacobi Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jacobi Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jacobi Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

JACOBI FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jacobi Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph