Skip to content
Jackson Family Charitable Trust Jack Chehebar Trustee at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Jackson Family Charitable Trust Jack Chehebar Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$191k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$346kHealth$60kArts & Culture$38kEducation$15kInternational$11kRecreation & Sports$7kPhilanthropy$3kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$3,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$908k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YDE SCHOOL$72,000
Individual grant recipient$17,200
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$12,000
THE SAFE FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,200
THE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$7,800
Individual grant recipient$7,200
KEREN EZER L'NEFESH$6,000
BET YAAKOV OROT SARA$5,600
YAD YOSEF$5,200
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA$5,001
CONG BETHEL OF FLATBUSH$4,600
LEMAHN ACHAI ACADEMY$3,600
YESHIVAT HECHAL SHEMUEL$3,600
CARMEI HAIR INTERNATIONAL$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $3k → 17%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 15 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
24

Total granted

$318k
$189k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
0%

Still filing today

20%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YD
    YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $113k · revenue +119%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $36k · revenue +63%
  • SF
    SAFE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • MA
    MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • AS
    AFO SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
6
Bet Midrash Ohel Torah

Operation of a post-secondary educational institution providing rabbinical training with a focus on sephardic/middle eastern jewish tradition.

Education
7
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
8
Beit Medrash of Great Neck Inc

To provide religious and educational studies

Religion
9
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
10
Meir Isa Bracha Inc

To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment

Religion
11
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
12
Asif Inc

ASIF helps its donees by providing information and performing due diligence on charitable organizations in Israel on the donees' behalf.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yad Mishkan Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bnos Malka Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/20
Grantees still filing
9/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $34,921 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHIndividual grant recipient: $22,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $22,400 · OtherSAFE FOUNDATION INCKEREN EZER L'NEFESH: $17,000 · OtherKEREN EZER L'NEFESHBET YAAKOV OROT SARA: $16,800 · OtherBET YAAKOV OROT SARAMISHKAN TORAH: $10,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherAFO SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · OtherMMC FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCONG BETHEL OF FLATBUSH: $9,600 · Other+28 more: $96,766 · Other+28 moreYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $113,200 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INCMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $100,000 · ReligionMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI …+1 more: $3,600 · ReligionFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $36,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $1,800 · Arts & CultureBonei Olam Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $2,600 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $1,200 · Human ServicesBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 · EducationBNOS MALKA ACADEMY: $3,000 · EducationLAPID YESHIVA INC: $1,000 · EducationAUDITORY ORAL FOUNDATION: $501 · EducationFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW: $5,200 · InternationalCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $3,600 · InternationalAMERICA GIVES INC: $2,600 · Philanthropy
Other$260,287Religion$216,800Arts & Culture$37,800Human Services$13,800Education$9,701International$8,800Philanthropy$2,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $22,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW: $5,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYAD MISHKAN INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBNOS MALKA ACADEMY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMekor Hayim Center Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAPID YESHIVA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUDITORY ORAL FOUNDATION: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds CARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds YAD MISHKAN INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS MALKA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Howard Hoffman & …Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…Jewish Communal FundIsaac & Marjorie Gind…Cabasso Family Founda…Reuben J Chehebar Cha…Jack D Cohen Foundati…The Amin and Lillian …The Jimmy and Berta K…E R G FoundationThe Maj Franco Family…
The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation IncNJ38.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · Reuben J Chehebar Charitable Trust Reuben J Chehebar Trustee · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · E R G Foundation · The Maj Franco Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jackson Family Charitable Trust Jack Chehebar Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jackson Family Charitable Trust Jack Chehebar Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jackson Family Charitable Trust Jack Chehebar Trustee?

    Find your warmest path to Jackson Family Charitable Trust Jack Chehebar Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jackson Family Charitable Trust Jack Chehebar Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home