Skip to content
Jack I and Lillian L Poses Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jack I and Lillian L Poses Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$50kCommunity Improvement$10kReligion$5kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$3kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$698k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
LEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE$10,000
WILDAID INC$5,000
NORTH SEA MARITIME CENTER$5,000
WEST 79TH BLOCK ASSOCIATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WILDAID INC: $5k → 10%FOLLY TREE ARBORETUM: $600 → 7%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%OALAXIS FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%LEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE: $10k → 14%US SKI TEAM SNOWBOARD: $3k → 5%NORTH SEA MARITIME CENTER: $5k → 7%PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $10k → 17%LEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE: $5k → 14%PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $10k → 17%PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $10k → 17%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $2k → 17%THE MAGIC CIRCLE: $39k → 17%MAGIC CIRCLE: $20k → 17%MAGIC CIRCLE: $20k → 17%MAGIC CIRCLE: $20k → 17%THE MAGIC CIRCLE: $18k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $100 → 17%ALZHEIMERS DAY DISCOVERY FDN: $3k → 17%WORLD CONNECT: $8k → 17%WORLD CONNECT: $3k → 17%WEST 79TH BLOCK ASSOCIATION: $2k → 17%AGOHAZO YOUTH VILLAGE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 4 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$173k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+19%

Still filing today

75%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalSocial ScienceAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2025 · $118k
  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue -55%
  • LR
    LEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • Cornell Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +46%
  • US
    US SKI TEAM SNOWBOARD
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
4
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
5
Parenteral Drug Association Inc

To develop scientifically sound, practical technical information and resources to advance science and regulation for the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industry through the expertise of our global membership.

—
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
11
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Inner City Education Dba Partnership Schools; the most unlike its peers is North Sea Maritime Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $117,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+6 more: $8,700 · Other+6 moreCornell University: $20,000 · EducationCornell UniversityLEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE INC: $15,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP ROUNDTA…PARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $30,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNERSHIP FOR …UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $2,200 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH AP…WORLD CONNECT INC: $10,000 · InternationalWILDAID INC: $5,000 · AnimalsNORTH SEA MARITIME CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Social Science
Other$126,300Education$35,000Philanthropy$32,200International$10,000Animals$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000Social Science$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CONNECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWILDAID INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SEA MARITIME CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack I and Lillian L Poses Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack I and Lillian L Poses Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jack I and Lillian L Poses’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home