Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jack E and Eleanor Cannon Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$552k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$801kScience & Tech$670kAnimals$388kArts & Culture$371kHuman Services$202kPhilanthropy$150kHousing & Shelter$95kRecreation & Sports$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $352k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
$102,439
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Michigan - Sagher & Stacey Research$551,763
University of Michigan - Health Dept of Inter Med$433,778
Bucket List of Dreams$301,233
Love from Louie Inc$250,000
Neuroendocrine Cancer Awareness Network$150,159
Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center$102,439
St George Foundation$99,810
University of Michigan - Sagher & Stacey Research$30,000
University of Michigan - Health Dept of Inter Med$25,000
Brass Band of Battle Creek$20,000
Blood Cancer United$20,000
Alzheimers Assn$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%disAbility Connections Inc: $14k → 13%Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center: $102k → 12%Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center: $25k → 12%Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center: $8k → 12%Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center: $5k → 12%Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Jack E and Eleanor Cannon Hill Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 74% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Jack E and Eleanor Cannon Hill Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 10 repeat orgs$642k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$2.1M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $499k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LOVE FROM LOUIE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $374k · revenue +14% · 40% of their budget
  • Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $142k · revenue +41%
  • GL
    GREAT LAKES BURN CAMP INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $24k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • BI
    BETHANY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -71%
  • PS
    PERFECTLY SCARRED INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • RR
    RESPONDER RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mymichigan Home Care

Creating healthy communities - together

2
Camp Bluebird of West Michigan

Camp bluebird of west michigan provides weekend retreats for adult cancer patients and survivors. our retreats give participants the opportunity to meet others who have shared their experience while offering dynamic spearkers, relaxation…

Human Services
3
Sparrow Specialty Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate long-term acute care to everyone, every time.

Health
4
Lending Hands of Michigan Inc

The mission of lending hands is to lend various kinds of home medical and other related equipment, for free and on a temporary basis, to anyone living in our service area without regard to age, race, sex, creed, income or disability.

Health
5
Joslin Diabetes Center Inc

Our mission is to prevent, treat, and cure diabetes. our vision is a world free of diabetes and its complications.

Health
6
Great Lakes Bay Health Centers

To provide high quality health care to individuals and community groups in Saginaw, Bay, and other nearby counties. Services are provided without regard to race, beliefs or ability to pay.

Health
7
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

SRAlab is dedicated to providing the best patient outcomes through the highest-quality clinical care, translational research, scientific discovery and education.

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
10
Transplant House of West Michigan

The Transplant House of West Michigan is organized to provide individuals and their families that are going through the organ transplant process an affordable temporary home away from home in West Michigan to ease the transitions of their…

Housing & Shelter
11
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
12
Berrien County Cancer Services Inc

To provide compassionate in-home skilled nursing care and supportive resources for those affected by cancer and related illnesses in southwest michigan.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Disability Connections Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Michigan - Sagher & Stacey Research — $669,763 · OtherUniversity of Michigan - Sagher & Stacey ResearchUniversity of Michigan - Health Dept of Inter Med — $458,778 · OtherUniversity of Michigan - Health Dept of Inter MedBucket List of Dreams — $351,233 · OtherBucket List of DreamsSt George Foundation — $149,810 · OtherSt George Foundation+8 more — $142,500 · Other+8 moreLOVE FROM LOUIE INC — $374,000 · AnimalsLOVE FROM LOUIE…Neuroendocrine Cancer Awareness Network — $249,659 · HealthNeuroendoc…+2 more — $5,000 · HealthSherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center — $142,439 · Human ServicesDISABILITY CONNECTIONS INC — $14,000 · Human ServicesOur Neighbors Keeper — $95,000 · Housing & ShelterBETHANY INC — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterGREAT LAKES BURN CAMP INC — $24,000 · Recreation & SportsBrass Band of Battle Creek — $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,772,084Animals$374,000Health$254,659Human Services$156,439Housing & Shelter$130,000Recreation & Sports$24,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOVE FROM LOUIE INC — $374,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetNeuroendocrine Cancer Awareness Network — $249,659 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetSherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center — $142,439 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetOur Neighbors Keeper — $95,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetBETHANY INC — $35,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetGREAT LAKES BURN CAMP INC — $24,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetDISABILITY CONNECTIONS INC — $14,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSOAR CAFE AND FARMS — $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCenter for Family Health — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOVE FROM LOUIE INC
  • Who funds Neuroendocrine Cancer Awareness Network
  • Who funds Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center
  • Who funds Our Neighbors Keeper
  • Who funds BETHANY INC
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES BURN CAMP INC
  • Who funds Brass Band of Battle Creek
  • Who funds RESPONDER RESCUE INC
  • Who funds DISABILITY CONNECTIONS INC
  • Who funds SOAR CAFE AND FARMS
  • Who funds Center for Family Health
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jack E and Eleanor Cannon Hill Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jack E and Eleanor Cannon Hill Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jack E and Eleanor Cannon Hill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph