Skip to content
Jack Chehebar Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jack Chehebar Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$501k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$8.0MPhilanthropy$3.5MHuman Services$2.0MEducation$838kHealth$320kFood & Nutrition$198kInternational$112kCommunity Improvement$109kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k36 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $586k
  • $250k+1 grant · $501k
$1,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HILLEL YESHIVA$501,305
THE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INC$236,200
SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC$200,000
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH$100,256
THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC CO MIDDLEGATE SECURITIES$50,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC$10,000
SHALOM FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
MERKAZ HAGEULA INC$8,600
CONGREGATION BEIT YOSEF OF DEAL$6,200
GABRIELLES ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$5,000
THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS AMERICAN SECTION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHALOM FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%MY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $300 → 20%DEAL FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $300 → 6%DEAL FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $300 → 6%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $5k → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $300 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 45 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
138

Total granted

$2.6M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+5%

Still filing today

47%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $571k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $449k · revenue +2%
  • NY
    NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +8%
  • DS
    DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $66k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • YY
    YESHIVAH YDE DOMESTIC WIRE TRANSFER
    one grant, 2022 · $2.6M
  • TS
    THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTERGABE
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M
  • YM
    YESHIVA MAGEN ABRAHAM CHURBA
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
7
University of Judaism Foundation
—
8
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
9
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
10
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Chehebar Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 196 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
22/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVAH YDE DOMESTIC WIRE TRANSFER: $2,600,035 · OtherYESHIVAH YDE DOMESTIC WIRE TRANSFERTHE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTERGABE: $2,000,035 · OtherTHE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTERGABEYESHIVA MAGEN ABRAHAM CHURBA: $2,000,000 · OtherYESHIVA MAGEN ABRAHAM CHURBACHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATIONOUR FUND: $1,223,750 · OtherCHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATIONOUR FUNDCHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATION: $815,000 · OtherCHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATIONTHE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INC: $740,813 · OtherEDMOND SAFRA MANSOUR SHUL: $654,800 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $545,256 · Other+163 more: $4,600,448 · Other+163 moreBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · EducationNew York University: $40,000 · Education+4 more: $22,450 · EducationSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $449,000 · Religion+3 more: $12,800 · ReligionNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $115,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $55,000 · Health+5 more: $11,400 · HealthChabad Terror Victims Project Inc: $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $7,200 · International+3 more: $3,200 · InternationalTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $100,000 · Food & NutritionDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $66,001 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,365 · Youth Development
Other$15,180,137Education$562,450Religion$461,800Health$181,400International$110,400Food & Nutrition$100,000Youth Development$68,366

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATION: $815,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $449,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $115,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChabad Terror Victims Project Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $66,001 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFlatbush Shomrim Safety Patrol Inc: $50,500 over 2y, 21% of budgetNew York University: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $12,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $11,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $11,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHKY KOL YAAKAB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $7,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH AND TEFILAH RAMAT ESHKOL INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,365 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $1,950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY SARAH TAWIL FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAGEN AVRAHAM FUND: $1,100 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHatzolah of Mill BasinCanarsie Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL SCHOLARSHIP EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEAL FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTZEDAKAH UMARPE CHARITY FUND RIBBI SHIMEON BAR YOHAY: $600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHATZALAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROPEL NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYITAV LEV CHARITY INC: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYCHILD'SCANCER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABAYIT HOME AWAY FROM HOME INC: $230 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Terror Victims Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Flatbush Shomrim Safety Patrol Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Communal FundIsaac & Marjorie Gind…The Howard Hoffman & …E R G FoundationChehebar Family Found…Haddad Brands Family …I Chera & Sons Founda…Ralph J Harary Founda…The Maj Franco Family…Jack D Cohen Foundati…Cabasso Family Founda…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY53.1× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · E R G Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · Haddad Brands Family Foundation · I Chera & Sons Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Maj Franco Family Charitable Foundation · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack Chehebar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack Chehebar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jack Chehebar Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jack Chehebar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 196 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack Chehebar’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home