Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jack and Nancy Munson Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2020
16
Grants FY2020
9
States reached
$189k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Jack and Nancy Munson Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Waco Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What you fund
01FY2020 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k15 grants · $7k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $189k
$330
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WACO FOUNDATION$188,607
HEART OF TEXAS YOUNG MARINES$1,000
FRIENDS FOR LIFE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MCLENNAN COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
VAUGHN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$600
HISTORIC WACO FOUNDATION$330
LEGACY COALITION$200
MASONIC HOME OF MISSOURI$200
THE NAVIGATORS$150
COVENANT HOUSE$100
FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION$100
NAZARENE FUND$100
HARRY TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE$50
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%MASONIC HOME OF MISSOURI: $200 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
NY
CA
UT
MO
VA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
2
Waco 40 Days
Civil Rights
3
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
4
Dallas Leadership Foundation

To identify, affirm, and develop leaders to transform communities.

Public Benefit
5
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

6
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
7
Linden Grove Ministries

The organization provides support to develop christian pastors and church leaders through coaching, mentoring, and consulting programs, developing and publishing multimedia training materials and instructional literature, and cultivating…

Religion
8
Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization

The lausanne movement exists to activate the body of christ to accelerate global mission together through convening global influencers, creating biblically grounded missional content, fostering catalytic collaboration, and equipping…

Religion
9
Lutheran Social Services of Colorado

Rooted in the values of kindness, dignity and social justice, lfsrm strenghtens communities by providing support, guidance, and resource coordination to individuals and families throughout the rocky mountain region.

10
Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services
11
The Covenant Foundation
12
The Interfaith Alliance Foundation Inc

Interfaith alliance is a growing network of people of diverse faiths and beliefs across the country working together to build a resilient democracy and fulfill america's promise of religious freedom and civil rights not just for some, but…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Nazarene Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WACO FOUNDATION — $188,607 · PhilanthropyWACO FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherMCLENNAN COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $1,000 · OtherHEART OF TEXAS YOUNG MARINES — $1,000 · OtherVAUGHN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $600 · Other+4 more — $350 · OtherFRIENDS FOR LIFE — $1,000 · HealthHISTORIC WACO FOUNDATION INC — $330 · Arts & CultureMASONIC HOME OF MISSOURI — $200 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $100 · Human ServicesLEGACY COALITION — $200 · ReligionFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC — $100 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$188,607Other$4,950Health$1,000Arts & Culture$330Human Services$300Religion$200Civil Rights$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWACO FOUNDATION — $188,607 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC WACO FOUNDATION INC — $330 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASONIC HOME OF MISSOURI — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAZARENE FUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jack and Nancy Munson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph