Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jack & Bill McGovern Memorial Foundation

The foundation will raise funds and issue grants to 501(c)(3) organizations dedicated to research, the development of treatment programs and detection of various cancers as well as improving the quality of life for those battling the disease.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Education$93kHealth$85kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $107,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $110,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$81k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$15,000
KIDNEY CAN FOUNDATION$15,000
GO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE VALERIE FUND CAMP HAPPY TIMES$10,000
BOY & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON$10,000
TOMMY STRONG FOUNDATION$10,000
COLLEGE OF HOLY CROSS$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%GO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $13k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$148k · 4 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$148k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
0%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $33k · revenue +5%
  • KC
    KIDNEY CAN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $28k

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON INC
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • TS
    TOMMY STRONG FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue +144%
  • TV
    THE VALERIE FUND CAMP HAPPY TIMES
    one grant, 2025 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $60,000 · OtherBERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLKIDNEY CAN FOUNDATION — $27,500 · OtherKIDNEY CAN FOUNDATIONTHE VALERIE FUND CAMP HAPPY TIMES — $10,000 · OtherTHE VALERIE FUND CAMP HAPPY TIMESMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $27,500 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCRE…GO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesGO4THEGOAL FOUNDATIONTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $32,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE COL…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTOMMY STRONG FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Health
Other$97,500Human Services$37,500Education$32,500Youth Development$10,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGO4THEGOAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jack & Bill McGovern Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jack & Bill McGovern Memorial Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jack & Bill McGovern Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph