Skip to content
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1,045
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$516k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$24MHuman Services$1.3MHealth$890kEducation$730kPhilanthropy$596kInternational$241kFood & Nutrition$226kYouth Development$138kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1045 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k977 grants · $1.5M
  • $10k–50k59 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $739k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$1,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$235k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATERET TORAH CENTER$515,550
YAD YOSEF$494,524
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA$186,560
BET MIDRASH GADOL ATERET TORAH$127,900
CONGREGATION OHR MEIR INC$122,500
SIMHA ORGANIZATION$98,600
GEMAH BET YISRAEL INC$85,750
CONGREGATION TIFERES YAAKOV OZER DALIM$65,155
TAG FLATBUSH$53,000
CONGREGATION MESHECH CHOCHMA INC$46,000
CONGREGATION AHAVAT SHALOM$42,150
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$42,000
SAFE$40,700
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN$40,000
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM$39,918
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORSEEABLE FUTURE FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 4%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEER HATORAH: $10k → 11%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $5k → 17%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $81k → 11%SID JACOBSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 6%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 11%MESILA INTERNATIONAL INC: $6k → 14%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $11k → 11%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 11%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $11k → 20%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $9k → 11%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $9k → 11%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $7k → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $7k → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $40k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $32k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES INC: $5k → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $28k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $26k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $21k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 20%A TIME: $13k → 20%RENEWAL OF LIFE: $9k → 20%RENEWAL OF LIFE: $7k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $14k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $11k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $8k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $8k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $6k → 20%RENEWAL OF LIFE: $5k → 20%RENEWAL OF LIFE: $4k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $4k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 20%TAG FLATBUSH: $150k → 20%TAG FLATBUSH: $101k → 20%TAG FLATBUSH: $79k → 20%TAG FLATBUSH: $53k → 20%TAG FLATBUSH: $50k → 20%TAG FLATBUSH: $26k → 20%GEMAH LEHALVOT INC: $20k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $10k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER INC: $6k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 20%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
AR
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 1206 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

1206 repeat relationships: 796 still active in FY2025, 410 since wound down; 211 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1206
578

Total granted

$27M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

30%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $308k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TAG FLATBUSH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $459k · revenue +24%
  • YL
    Yeshivat Lev Torah
    6× · 2020–2025 · $342k · revenue +176%
  • SO
    SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $267k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • RJ
    RALPH J HARARY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $69k · revenue +213%
  • SM
    SEPHARDIC MIKVAH ISRAEL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $67k · revenue -9%
  • BM
    BET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH OF LAKEWOOD
    one grant, 2021 · $66k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
5
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
6
American Friends of Hamesorah Talmud Torah Inc

Charity and education in u.s. and israel

—
7
Sherit Isroel
—
8
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
11
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Friends of Nir Kiryat Arba

To promote the study of torah

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Ner Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gabriel and Sara Bildirici Hesed Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

597 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 597 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
179
Early backer (in before they grew)
551/597
Grantees still filing
365/597
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATERET TORAH CENTER: $4,084,459 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTERYAD YOSEF: $2,091,538 · OtherYAD YOSEFOHEL YAAKOV INC: $1,029,086 · OtherOHEL YAAKOV INCYAD YOSEF TORAH CENTER: $697,943 · OtherBET MEDRASH GADOL ATERET TORAH: $567,677 · Other+136 more: $8,509,652 · Other+136 moreYeshivat Lev Torah: $341,800 · ReligionMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $162,061 · ReligionZohar Hatorah Inc: $151,000 · ReligionMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $92,011 · ReligionSHALSHELET SEMINARY INC: $89,000 · ReligionSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $88,000 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $83,900 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $74,943 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LMAN ACHAI INC: $74,850 · ReligionYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $55,203 · ReligionNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS: $54,500 · Religion+7 more: $185,701 · ReligionGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $816,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $218,500 · PhilanthropyRCTT REVIVING COMMUNITIES THROUGH TORAH: $70,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $59,900 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $52,340 · Philanthropy+3 more: $121,316 · PhilanthropyYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $206,000 · EducationYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $194,500 · EducationBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $112,200 · EducationREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $104,840 · EducationMABAS FUND INC: $82,401 · EducationBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $69,500 · EducationHKY KOL YAAKAB INC: $68,000 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $64,900 · EducationYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $51,250 · Education+7 more: $179,964 · EducationTAG FLATBUSH INC: $458,501 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $152,802 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $148,473 · Human ServicesWE LOVE TO HELP: $54,431 · Human ServicesKETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC: $34,400 · Human Services+3 more: $74,200 · Human ServicesSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $267,100 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $77,500 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $61,253 · HealthKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $39,652 · HealthSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC: $37,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $26,000 · HealthSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $172,800 · Youth DevelopmentDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $127,802 · Youth Development
Other$16,980,355Religion$1,452,969Philanthropy$1,398,556Education$1,133,555Human Services$922,807Health$508,505Youth Development$300,602

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $816,500 over 6y, 40% of budgetTAG FLATBUSH INC: $458,501 over 6y, 16% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $341,800 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $267,100 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $218,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $206,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $194,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $172,800 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $170,850 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $162,061 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $152,802 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetZohar Hatorah Inc: $151,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $148,473 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $127,802 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $112,200 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $106,800 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $104,840 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $92,011 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetSHALSHELET SEMINARY INC: $89,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $88,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $83,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $82,401 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $77,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $74,943 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LMAN ACHAI INC: $74,850 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetRCTT REVIVING COMMUNITIES THROUGH TORAH: $70,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $69,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetRALPH J HARARY FOUNDATION INC: $68,750 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetHKY KOL YAAKAB INC: $68,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetOR HACHAYIM INC: $67,600 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVAH ISRAEL INC: $66,667 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON: $66,600 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $64,900 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $61,253 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $59,900 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $55,203 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEBREW DAY SCHOOLS: $54,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWE LOVE TO HELP: $54,431 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $52,340 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $51,250 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetALWAYS BETTER TOGETHER INC: $47,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC: $46,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $45,316 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $43,200 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKamenitzer Yeshiva of Jerusalem: $40,700 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $39,652 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetImanu: $38,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEMAH BET YISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds TAG FLATBUSH INC ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗
  • Who funds SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Zohar Hatorah Inc ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Adjmi-Dwek Founda…The Jimmy and Berta K…Ralph J Harary Founda…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…The Howard Hoffman & …The Amin and Lillian …Chehebar Family Found…The Setton FoundationThe Jmg FoundationThe Foop FoundationCabasso Family Founda…Zichron Yechiel Meche…
The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation IncNY250.5× affinity203 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The Foop Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 200%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack Adjmi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home