Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

J W Leahy Fdn Restrict Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$40kHuman Services$6kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$4kCivil Rights$3kCrime & Legal$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$2,208
Median grant
2
States reached
$627k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$17,664
REGIONAL HOSPICE$2,208
CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT & EDUCATION$2,208
HOUSATONIC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,208
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,208
ANN'S PLACE INC$2,208
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,208
DANBURY MUSEUM & HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,208
CANDLEWOOD VALLEY REGIONAL LAND TRUST$2,207
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
0/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $35,605 · OtherDANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY — $4,708 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHOUSATONIC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $3,200 · OtherHOUSATONIC HABITAT FOR HUMANITYCENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT & — $2,500 · OtherThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc — $2,208 · OtherHousatonic Habitat for Humanity — $2,208 · OtherDANBURY MUSEUM & HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,208 · OtherCANDLEWOOD VALLEY REGIONAL LAND TRUST — $2,207 · Other+3 more — $4,000 · Other+3 moreANNS PLACE INC — $2,208 · Human ServicesANNS PLACE …REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $2,208 · Human ServicesREGIONAL HO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,208 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…
Other$58,844Human Services$6,624

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANNS PLACE INC — $2,208 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $2,208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center For Empowerment And Education Inc — $2,208 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHousatonic Habitat for Humanity — $2,208 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANDLEWOOD VALLEY REGIONAL LAND TRUST — $2,207 over 1y, 24% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Patrick FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patrick Foundation · Savings Bank of Danbury Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization J W Leahy Fdn Restrict Fd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J W Leahy Fdn Restrict Fd?

    Find your warmest path to J W Leahy Fdn Restrict Fd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph