Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Philip & Jennifer Dinapoli Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$293k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$591kEducation$376kFood & Nutrition$180kHuman Services$135kReligion$60kHealth$40kPhilanthropy$15k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $215k
$22,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTALVO ARTS CENTER$90,000
BELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPATORY$75,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$22,500
CHILDRENS MUSICAL THEATRE$20,000
SACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL$15,000
JESUIT WEST CO SACRED HEART JESUIT CENTER$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO OPERA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+2%

Still filing today

33%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MONTALVO ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $480k · revenue +97%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
    6× · 2018–2024 · $180k
  • CC
    Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties
    7× · 2017–2024 · $134k · revenue -8%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -25%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • YD
    Yavneh Day School
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
3
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
4
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
5
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
7
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
8
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
9
Vistamar School

Vistamar school empowers students, preparing them to contribute and excel in higher education and in life, and commits to: a broad and balanced program that challenges and engages students, building their individual skills and inspiring a…

Education
10
The Seven Hills School

The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.

—
11
Carlthorp School

Carlthorp school is an independent, nonprofit day school for children in grades k-6. carlthorp school provides a strong academic foundation in a diverse and nurturing school community that emphasizes traditional values, disciplined work…

Education
12
Maranatha High School

Maranatha high school is a christ-centered, evangelical college preparatory school that celebrates the whole student by equipping hearts and minds to reflect god's glory through academics, as well as the arts, athletics, and service. we…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cristo Rey San Jose High School; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $180,020 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $133,750 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside CountiesBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $75,000 · OtherBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORYNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $73,638 · OtherNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOLJESUIT WEST CO SACRED HEART JESUIT CENTER: $59,770 · OtherJESUIT WEST CO SACRED HEART JESUIT CENTERPRESENTATION HIGH SCHOOL SAN JOSE: $48,752 · OtherPRESENTATION HIGH SCHOOL SAN JOSECRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL: $45,674 · OtherCRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOLCHILDRENS MUSICAL THEATRE: $40,000 · OtherCHILDRENS MUSICAL THEATRE+3 more: $12,049 · OtherMONTALVO ASSOCIATION: $479,628 · Arts & CultureMONTALVO ASSOCIATIONSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureSACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL: $101,000 · EducationSACRED HE…CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationCRISTO RE…Yavneh Day School: $5,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS: $5,000 · EducationVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $35,048 · HealthCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $5,000 · HealthUNITED WAY INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$668,653Arts & Culture$550,128Education$121,000Health$40,048Philanthropy$15,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTALVO ASSOCIATION: $479,628 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $133,750 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL: $101,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $35,048 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYavneh Day School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTALVO ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART NATIVITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Yavneh Day School ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CAREPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE TECH INTERACTIVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Matt & Gretchen Dinapoli Family FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Matt & Gretchen Dinapoli Family Foundation · The Brandenburg Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Stephen C & Patricia A Schott Foundation · Leo M Shortino Family Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Catholic Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Bright Funds Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Philip & Jennifer Dinapoli Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Philip & Jennifer Dinapoli Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Philip & Jennifer Dinapoli’s filings →

    More from the funding graph