Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Gladwin Cannon Trust Ua Dated 10-7-76

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Public Benefit$49kEnvironment$47kArts & Culture$30kHuman Services$27kFood & Nutrition$20k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$364k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Suffield Land Conservancy$5,000
Suffield Historical Society$5,000
Friends of Hilltop Farm$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 7 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$145k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-10%

Still filing today

71%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $27k · revenue +36%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDS OF THE FARM AT HILLTOP INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +111%
  • CA
    CONNECTICUT AERONAUTICAL HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $6k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • TO
    TOWN OF SUFFIELD
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • TO
    Town of Suffield Barn Quilts
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • CL
    Connecticut Landmarks Society
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $41,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFriends of Hilltop Farm: $20,000 · OtherFriends of Hilltop FarmSuffield Historical Society: $5,000 · OtherSuffield Historical SocietyTOWN OF SUFFIELD: $5,000 · OtherTOWN OF SUFFIELDTown of Suffield Barn Quilts: $4,950 · OtherTown of Suffield Barn QuiltsConnecticut Landmarks Society: $4,000 · OtherTown of Suffield-Trees for Suffield Initiative: $3,500 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherSUFFIELD LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $32,500 · EnvironmentSUFFIELD LAND CONSERV…THE FRIENDS OF THE FARM AT HILLTOP INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureTHE FRIENDS OF TH…THE ANTIQUARIAN & LANDMARKS SOCIETY INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ANTIQUARIAN &…CONNECTICUT AERONAUTICAL HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT AERON…The Suffield Observer Inc: $2,500 · Arts & CultureThe Suffield Obse…NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $26,500 · Human ServicesNETWORK AGAINST D…
Other$86,450Environment$32,500Arts & Culture$27,000Human Services$26,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUFFIELD LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $32,500 over 7y, 8.6% of budgetNETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $26,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE FARM AT HILLTOP INC: $10,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetTHE ANTIQUARIAN & LANDMARKS SOCIETY INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCONNECTICUT AERONAUTICAL HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSuffield Historical Society: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe Suffield Observer Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUFFIELD LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE FARM AT HILLTOP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANTIQUARIAN & LANDMARKS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT AERONAUTICAL HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Suffield Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds The Suffield Observer Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Gladwin Cannon Trust Ua Dated 10-7-76 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Gladwin Cannon Trust Ua Dated 10-7-76. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Gladwin Cannon Trust Ua Dated 10-7-76’s filings →

    More from the funding graph