Skip to content

· Private foundation

J Fred Danker Family Foundation In

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$73kReligion$53kFood & Nutrition$19kYouth Development$13kRecreation & Sports$13kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$678k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILIES IN NEED DUNNELLON$7,000
ST PAULS LUTHERN CHURCH$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
CITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC$3,000
PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
PORTSMOUTH YOUTH BASKETBALL$2,000
YMCA OF PORTSMOUTH RI$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EAST COOPER COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $4k → 12%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE INC: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$170k · 12 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$170k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+52%

Still filing today

33%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    ST PAULS LUTHERN CHURCH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $41k
  • FI
    FAMILIES IN NEED DUNNELLON
    7× · 2019–2025 · $41k
  • YO
    YMCA OF RHODE ISLAND
    4× · 2017–2023 · $15k

Funded once

  • EC
    East Cooper Community Outreach
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +23%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +52%
  • PY
    PORTSMOUTH YOUTH FOOTBALL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orange Food 2 Kids
Food & Nutrition
2
Max for Kids
—
3
Kids Bring Life Inc

Our programs are geared to assist those children in low to moderate income families by providing free nutritious meals so they can can focus on their education which will later enable them to become adults that do not become victims of…

—
4
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
5
Kids Can Succeed

Kids Can Succeed is committed to helping children, especially those who live in poverty, to reach their full potential and achieve their dreams. Through our far-reaching programs, we strive constantly to make an impact on kids from all…

Youth Development
6
King Hoops United

Empower the youth of new york city through basketball, providing them with academic enrichment, career development, and a strong sense of community to unlock their full potential

Youth Development
7
Care for the Children

Our mission is to provide homebound older adults with low income with nutritious food box delivery. Additionally, our food distribution program provides food to all in the communities we serve who need a helping hand. Our programs aim to…

—
8
Orange County's United Way

To improve lives in orange county by delivering measurable long-term solutions to complex issues in education, financial stability, and housing. orange county united way (ocuw) is committed to breaking barriers and improving lives for…

Philanthropy
9
Step Up for Students - Florida Inc

Step up for students empowers families to pursue and engage in the most appropriate learning options for their children, with an emphasis on families who lack the information and financial resources to access these options. by pursuing…

Education
10
Creighton Community Foundation

Creighton community foundation's (ccf) core program "community works" leverages neighborhood schools to support vibrant communities in the poorest parts of urban phoenix, where neighborhoods suffer from poverty- driven disadvantage and…

Philanthropy
11
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
12
Innovations Educational Services

To foster a community of student learners who are focused on developing the necessary inner resources, responsibilty & personal commitment for academic, social & personal change.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukulele Kids Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is Portsmouth Youth Basketball. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAULS LUTHERN CHURCH: $40,500 · OtherST PAULS LUTHERN CHURCHFAMILIES IN NEED DUNNELLON: $40,500 · OtherFAMILIES IN NEED DUNNELLONYMCA OF RHODE ISLAND: $15,000 · OtherYMCA OF RHODE ISLANDST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILIES IN NEED OF DUNNELLON FL: $5,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $7,000 · OtherCITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionPORTSMOUTH YOUTH BASKETBALL: $10,500 · Recreation & SportsUKULELE KIDS CLUB INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $6,000 · Human ServicesEast Cooper Community Outreach: $4,000 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Education
Other$134,000Food & Nutrition$14,000Recreation & Sports$10,500Youth Development$10,000Human Services$10,000Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPORTSMOUTH YOUTH BASKETBALL: $10,500 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetUKULELE KIDS CLUB INC: $10,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEast Cooper Community Outreach: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTSMOUTH YOUTH BASKETBALL ↗
  • Who funds UKULELE KIDS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds East Cooper Community Outreach ↗
  • Who funds BE GREAT FOR NATE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J Fred Danker Family Foundation In funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J Fred Danker Family Foundation In. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J Fred Danker Family Foundation In’s filings →

    More from the funding graph