· Private foundation
J B Cash Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $5k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| CHRIST BAPTIST CHURCH | $30,000 |
| CORAL REEF ELEMENTARY PTA | $21,666 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $21,666 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA | $10,833 |
| ST ANDREW'S GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $10,833 |
| CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,667 |
| LIBERTY GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,667 |
| SHELBYVILLE MILLS BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,667 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 85% of grant dollars ($882k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($161k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 15% of all-years giving ($161k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCORAL REEF ELEMENTARY PTA6× · 2019–2024 · $193k
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2021–2024 · $161k
- CBCHRIST BAPTIST CHURCH3× · 2021–2024 · $92k
Funded once
- BHBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +6%
- CBCHIRST BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $28k
- CHCHAPEL HILL LIBRARY MINISTRIESone grant, 2019 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
Foundation for christian counseling mission is to make the church more than any hospital or clinic to be known as the place for healing, growth and life changing relationships
Bicm is a preaching, teaching and prophetic ministry that engages in reaching out to the less fortunate, sick and shut in, broken hearted and poor in our communities within the united states and around the world by spreading the gospel of…
Biblical instruction
To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans
Religious
Missionary support
Bible studies by mail
To provide religious and spiritual development to people and oranizations worldwide.
To minister to the church at large the healing love of god via preaching and teaching the truth of the bible. through preaching the word of god, people will experience the peace of god, comfort for their souls, and healing of broken…
Present the gospel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baptist Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is First Choice Pregnancy Counseling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ed Lacy Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds REFORMERS UNANIMOUS INC ↗
- Who funds BIBLE LESSONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds BIBLICAL COUNSELING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST CHOICE PREGNANCY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization J B Cash Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.