Skip to content

· Private foundation

J B Atkins Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$233kArts & Culture$143kHousing & Shelter$61kHuman Services$48kHealth$44kEnvironment$30kCivil Rights$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$481k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY$10,000
CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LA$5,000
SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL$5,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER$5,000
FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA$5,000
STRAND THEATER$5,000
COMMON GROUND COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NORWELA COUNCIL$1,000
LIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
SHREVEPORT OPERA$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SHREVEPORT-BOSSIER$500
INDEPENDENCE BOWL FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL: $154k → 22%SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL: $5k → 22%SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL: $4k → 22%SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL: $4k → 22%SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL: $4k → 22%SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL: $4k → 22%SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL: $4k → 22%SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL: $4k → 22%THE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA: $8k → 22%THE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA: $8k → 22%THE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA: $5k → 22%THE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA: $5k → 22%FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA: $5k → 22%FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA: $5k → 22%FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA: $5k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $10k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $10k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $10k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $10k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $10k → 22%MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER: $5k → 22%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $5k → 22%STRAND THEATER: $5k → 22%THE LIGHTHOUSE VOA: $5k → 22%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $5k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $5k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $5k → 22%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $5k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $5k → 22%VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $5k → 22%SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY: $5k → 22%MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER: $5k → 22%MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER: $5k → 22%FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER: $5k → 22%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $5k → 22%SHREVEPORT GREEN: $6k → 22%SHREVEPORT GREEN: $6k → 22%SHREVEPORT GREEN: $6k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LAGREAT TEACHERS & SCHOLARS FUND: $5k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LA: $5k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LA: $5k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LAGREAT TEACHERS & SCHOLARS FUND: $5k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LA: $5k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LAGREAT TEACHERS & SCHOLARS FUND: $5k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LAGREAT TEACHERS & SCHOLARS FUND: $5k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LA: $5k → 22%CENTENARY COLLEGE OF LAGREAT TEACHERS & SCHOLARS FUND: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$671k · 31 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
5

Total granted

$671k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+85%

Still filing today

48%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +11%
  • SG
    SHREVEPORT GREEN
    7× · 2017–2023 · $25k · revenue +106%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • SG
    SHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +85%
  • SR
    STEAMED RICE INC FKA SCI-PORT LOUISIANA'S SCIENCE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -99%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shreveport Common Inc

Shreveport Common Inc mission is to facilitate public/private partnerships to implement the Shreveport Common Vision Plan for an Arts-Inspired revitalization of Shreveport Common to an UNcommon Creative Cultural Community.

Community Improvement
2
Shreveport Charter School Inc

To be a provider of top quality education to a highly diverse student body. it will prepare all students for success in college, equip them with the ability and desire for lifelong learning, and strengthen their civic, ethical, and moral…

Education
3
Shreveport Symphony Guild Inc

Promote and support development of the local Shreveport Symphony, the Nena Plant Wideman competition, and to further the appreciation of symphonic music and allied arts through education

Arts & Culture
4
Shreveport Chamber of Commerce

Shreveport chamber of commerce provides various projects thoughout the year for chamber members.

—
5
Lsu Health Sciences Foundation in Shreveport

The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.

Philanthropy
6
The Strand Theatre of Shreveport Corporation

To manage cultural events while preserving the state theatre of louisiana - the historic strand.

—
7
Dsdc 2 Inc

To actively pursue, support, facilitate and welcome initiatives that aid and encourage private development, and promote and coordinate public development within the downtown development district of shreveport, louisiana.

Community Improvement
8
Lsu Health Sciences Building Foundation in Shreveport

All functions of the foundation are dedicated to supporting lsu health sciences center at shreveport.

Education
9
Greater Shreveport Chamber Foundation

Assistance in economic development.

Community Improvement
10
Shreveport Metropolitan Ballet

Cultural artistic performances to promote and preserve the art of classical ballet in the community

Arts & Culture
11
Beauregard Health System Foundation Inc

To assist in improving healthcare in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.

Health
12
Jazz St Louis

Jazz st louis is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to lead our community in advancing the uniquely american art of jazz through performance, education, and community engagement.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shreveport Symphony Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan Counseling Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLA: $47,000 · OtherTHE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING NWLAIndividual grant recipient: $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER: $29,000 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER KING CENTERCENTENARY COLLEGE OF LAGREAT TEACHERS & SCHOLARS FUND: $25,000 · OtherCENTENARY COLLEGE OF LAGREAT TEACHERS & SCHOLARS FUNDSHREVEPORT GREEN: $25,000 · OtherSHREVEPORT GREENSTRAND THEATER: $21,500 · OtherSTRAND THEATERSALVATION ARMY: $21,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $20,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICACENTENARY COLLEGE OF LA: $20,000 · OtherCENTENARY COLLEGE OF LACOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 · OtherTHE LIGHTHOUSE VOA: $15,000 · OtherCHRISTUS SCHUMPERT HEALTH SYSTEM FDN: $12,000 · Other+13 more: $67,500 · Other+13 moreSOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC: $183,000 · EducationSOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INCSHREVEPORT SYMPHONY INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT SYMPHO…Red River Film Society Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRed River Film So…FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFILM PRIZE FOUNDA…SHREVEPORT OPERA: $9,000 · Arts & CultureSHREVEPORT OPERARED RIVER REVEL ARTS FESTIVAL: $7,000 · Arts & CultureRED RIVER REVEL A…PROVIDENCE HOUSE: $14,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,000 · Community ImprovementST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,000 · HealthSHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB: $5,000 · EnvironmentINDEPENDENCE BOWL FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 · Recreation & Sports
Other$356,000Education$183,000Arts & Culture$106,000Community Improvement$21,000Health$9,000Environment$5,000Recreation & Sports$2,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC: $183,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetSHREVEPORT SYMPHONY INC: $70,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetSHREVEPORT GREEN: $25,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRed River Film Society Inc: $10,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFILM PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSamaritan Counseling Center: $9,500 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHREVEPORT OPERA: $9,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORWELA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 215: $7,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRED RIVER REVEL ARTS FESTIVAL: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS FOR YOUTH JUSTICE: $5,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetINDEPENDENCE BOWL FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEAMED RICE INC FKA SCI-PORT LOUISIANA'S SCIENCE CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHFIELD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT GREEN ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Red River Film Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds FILM PRIZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT OPERA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORWELA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 215 ↗
  • Who funds RED RIVER REVEL ARTS FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds LIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS FOR YOUTH JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT GARDEN STUDY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE BOWL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEAMED RICE INC FKA SCI-PORT LOUISIANA'S SCIENCE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA34.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · The Powers Foundation Inc · The Crow Foundation · Grayson Foundation Inc · Noel Foundation Inc · Zadeck Family Foundation · Willis-Knighton Medical Center · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · The Nelson Foundation · The Alta and John Franks Foundation · First Family Foundation of Nw Louisiana Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization J B Atkins Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J B Atkins Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to J B Atkins Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to J B Atkins Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J B Atkins’ filings →

    More from the funding graph