Skip to content
J A Leta M Chapman TR 486002AC2 at a glance

· Public charity

J A Leta M Chapman TR 486002AC2

Provides direct and permanent support to the named beneficiaries.

$56M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$17M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$191MHealth$119MPhilanthropy$8.5M
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,652,892
Median grant
3
States reached
$979M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$16,827,414
TRINITY UNIVERSITY$14,022,845
OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,652,892
ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER$10,348,225
JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY$2,804,569
TULSA AREA UNITED WAY$1,435,435
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TRINITY UNIVERSITY: $14.0M → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $16.9M → 15%OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10.7M → 16%JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $2.9M → 8%TRINITY UNIVERSITY: $14.0M → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $16.8M → 15%OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10.7M → 16%JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $2.8M → 8%TRINITY UNIVERSITY: $13.7M → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $16.5M → 15%OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10.4M → 16%JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $2.8M → 8%TRINITY UNIVERSITY: $12.7M → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $15.2M → 15%OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $9.6M → 16%JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $2.7M → 8%TRINITY UNIVERSITY: $12.5M → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $15.0M → 15%OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $9.5M → 16%JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $2.5M → 8%TRINITY UNIVERSITY: $12.5M → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF TULSA: $15.0M → 15%OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $9.4M → 16%JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $2.5M → 8%ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER: $11.3M → 15%ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER: $10.5M → 15%ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER: $10.3M → 15%ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER: $10.1M → 15%ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $9.2M → 15%ST JOHN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $7.0M → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318M · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$318M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    6× · 2019–2024 · $95M · revenue +15%
  • TU
    Trinity University
    6× · 2019–2024 · $79M · revenue +66%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60M · revenue +42%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    6/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    The University of Tulsa: $95,328,987 · EducationThe University of TulsaTrinity University: $79,440,822 · EducationTrinity UniversityJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $16,338,164 · EducationJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITYOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $60,205,142 · HealthOklahoma Medical Research FoundationSt John Medical Center Inc: $58,440,101 · HealthSt John Medical Center IncTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $8,460,073 · Other
    Education$191,107,973Health$118,645,243Other$8,460,073

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe University of Tulsa: $95,328,987 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetTrinity University: $79,440,822 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $60,205,142 over 6y, 10% of budgetSt John Medical Center Inc: $58,440,101 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $16,338,164 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $8,460,073 over 6y, 6.3% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
    • Who funds Trinity University ↗
    • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
    • Who funds St John Medical Center Inc ↗
    • Who funds JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization J A Leta M Chapman TR 486002AC2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from J A Leta M Chapman TR 486002AC2. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
    • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
    • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on J A Leta M Chapman TR 486002AC2’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home