Skip to content

· Private foundation

Iw Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$647kHuman Services$186kRecreation & Sports$156kArts & Culture$127kPhilanthropy$95kFood & Nutrition$75kHealth$50kCrime & Legal$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wikimedia Foundation$75,000
Gettysburg College$55,000
I Golf fore kids foundation$25,000
Westchester Jewish Community Center$25,000
Collage for Every students$25,000
Lenox Memorial Middle and High School$10,750
Lets Get Ready Inc$10,000
The Associated Jewish fund of Baltimore$10,000
Food bank NYC$10,000
Feeding america$10,000
Butternut Race Club$9,800
Monument Mountain High School$7,635
Trust Bridge Foundation$5,000
St Judes Children's Hospital$5,000
Ski Buttermut Ski Patrol$4,977
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Operation Warm: $3k → 10%Trust Bridge Foundation: $5k → 11%Operation Warm: $3k → 10%Trust Bridge Foundation: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 42 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

31%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $150k · revenue +11%
  • GC
    GETTYSBURG COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $110k · revenue +1%
  • TF
    TrustBridge Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • WN
    WESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • WJ
    WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY C
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • WN
    WESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
6
Open Technology Fund

The open technology fund aims to advance internet freedom globally by supporting the research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet.

Arts & Culture
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is TrustBridge Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operation Warm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $150,000 · OtherGETTYSBURG COLLEGEWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, INC: $125,000 · OtherWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, INCWestchester Jewish Community Center: $100,000 · OtherWestchester Jewish Community CenterCOLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT: $75,000 · OtherCOLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENTI GOLF FORE KIDS FOUNDATION: $72,750 · OtherI GOLF FORE KIDS FOUNDATIONCollage for Every students: $50,000 · OtherI GOLF FORE KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIETY OF NY: $50,000 · OtherMARIBETH & SUSAN SILVA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+31 more: $363,560 · Other+31 moreWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION I…GETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $110,000 · EducationGETTYSBURG COLLEGELET'S GET READY INC: $20,000 · EducationLET'S GET READY INCFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $20,000 · Community ImprovementFeeding America: $20,000 · Food & NutritionTrustBridge Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthHAPPINESS IS CAMPING: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,086,310Education$280,000Community Improvement$20,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Human Services$15,000Health$5,250Recreation & Sports$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustBridge Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPINESS IS CAMPING: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LET'S GET READY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds TrustBridge Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HAPPINESS IS CAMPING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iw Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iw Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Iw Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Iw Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph