Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ivanhoe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$150kHealth$104kPhilanthropy$9kInternational$5kPublic Benefit$1k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$730k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JFS ReelAbilities Houston Film & Arts Festival$20,000
JFS ReelAbilities Houston Film & Arts Festival$20,000
Rehabilitation Services Volunteer Project$1,000
Rehabilitation Services Volunteer Project$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Jewish Family Services: $50k → 16%Jewish Family Services: $25k → 16%Jewish Family Services: $25k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 16%Jewish Family Services: $15k → 16%Jewish Family Services: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$255k · 12 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$255k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+41%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +65%
  • UF
    Undies for Everyone
    3× · 2019–2021 · $9k · revenue +554%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IN
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROTOXINS ASSOC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • BI
    BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +41%
  • US
    UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTO
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
3
American Heart Association Inc

The american heart association's mission is to be a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives.

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
7
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
8
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

The professional, scientific, and credentialing association for clinical and research based audiologists and speech-language pathologists. empowering and supporting speech-language pathologists, audiologists, and speech, language, and…

—
11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
12
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Spinal Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Heart Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $150,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEJFS ReelAbilities Houston Film & Arts Festival: $40,000 · OtherJFS ReelAbilities Houston Film & Arts FestivalREHABILITATION SERVICES: $28,500 · OtherREHABILITATION SERVICESRehabilitation Services - Denver: $19,000 · OtherRehabilitation Services - DenverRehabilitation Services - Texas: $15,500 · OtherRehabilitation Services - TexasIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherFoundation for Physical Medicine Re: $5,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL NEUROTOXINS ASSOC: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $15,000 · Other+6 moreUndies for Everyone: $8,500 · PhilanthropyTHE HEART FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC: $8,500 · Public BenefitMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,500 · InternationalREHABILITATION SERVICES VOLUNTEER PROJECT: $2,000 · HealthHOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE: $1,500 · Health
Human Services$150,000Other$134,000Philanthropy$9,500Public Benefit$8,500International$4,500Health$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $150,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUndies for Everyone: $8,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEART FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Undies for Everyone ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds REHABILITATION SERVICES VOLUNTEER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ivanhoe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ivanhoe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ivanhoe Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ivanhoe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ivanhoe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph