Skip to content
Iuoe Local 12 Charitable Golf Committee Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Iuoe Local 12 Charitable Golf Committee Inc

To raise funds for public charities.

$107k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$266kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kReligion$48kEducation$42kYouth Development$20k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $43,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $106,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $63,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Be Perfect Foundation$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
CITY OF HOPE$10,000
FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER$7,000
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Construction vs Cancer: $8k → 10%John Burton Advocates for Youth: $10k → 10%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $15k → 14%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $6k → 14%AFSP Attn Data Entry: $10k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $15k → 17%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $6k → 9%John Burton Advocates for Youth: $10k → 10%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $13k → 14%CITY OF HOPE Employee Giving #130510: $25k → 14%AFSP Attn Data Entry: $10k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $13k → 17%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $8k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $10k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $12k → 17%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $7k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $10k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $12k → 17%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $6k → 14%CITY OF HOPE Employee Giving #130510: $10k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $12k → 17%CITY OF HOPE: $6k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%Be Perfect Foundation: $10k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%Be Perfect Foundation: $10k → 14%ST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $12k → 14%ST ANDREWS SCHOOL: $12k → 14%ST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 14%ST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 14%ST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 14%ST ANDREWS SCHOOL: $8k → 14%ST ANDREWS SCHOOL: $8k → 14%ST ANDREWS SCHOOL: $8k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $7k → 14%ST ANDREWS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $6k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $6k → 14%ST ANDREWS SCHOOL: $6k → 14%FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER: $12k → 14%FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER: $8k → 14%FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER: $7k → 14%FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER: $7k → 14%FOOTHILL UNITY CENTER: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$368k · 9 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -81% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$368k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-81%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +145%
  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $49k · revenue +89%
  • BP
    BE PERFECT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
3
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
12
American College of Surgeons

The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $83,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCCITY OF HOPE: $74,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPEBE PERFECT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthBE PERFECT FOUNDATIONAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $20,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTIONAmerican Diabetes Association: $12,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes AssociationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,000 · HealthLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $48,500 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HO…ST ANDREWS CHURCH: $48,000 · OtherST ANDREWS CHURCHST ANDREW SCHOOL: $41,500 · OtherST ANDREW SCHOOLNETWORK FOR GOOD: $61,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOO…John Burton Advocates for Youth: $20,000 · Youth Development
Health$217,500Other$138,000Public Safety & Disaster$61,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $83,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $74,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $61,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $48,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBE PERFECT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Burton Advocates for Youth: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Iuoe Local 12 Charitable Golf Committee Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Iuoe Local 12 Charitable Golf Committee Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Iuoe Local 12 Charitable Golf Committee Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Iuoe Local 12 Charitable Golf Committee Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Iuoe Local 12 Charitable Golf Committee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home