Skip to content

· Public charity

Islandwood

The primary goal is to help children & adults develop a commitment to lifelong learning & environmental and community stewardship through hands-on learning experiences combining science, technology, & the arts at ISLANDWOOD's 255-acre outdoor learning center and in schools.

$307k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$859k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $54,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $307,293 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $252,893 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$9,555
Median grant
1
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROBERT EAGLE MIDDLE SCHOOL$20,575
SARTORI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,150
FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$9,555
BAILEY GATZERT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$7,850
SEATTLE NATIVITY SCHOOL$6,270
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BAILEY GATZERT ELEMENTARY: $18k → 9%LIBERTY ELEMENTARY: $14k → 9%MCCARVER ELEMENTARY: $13k → 9%KITSAP LAKE ELEMENTARY: $10k → 10%LESCHI ELEMENTARY: $11k → 9%ALLEN CREEK ELEMENTARY: $9k → 9%KITSAP LAKE ELEMENTARY: $9k → 10%LESCHI ELEMENTARY: $9k → 9%CROWNHILL ELEMENTARY: $8k → 10%BAILEY GATZERT ELEMENTARY: $8k → 9%MCCARVER ELEMENTARY: $11k → 9%HORIZON ELEMENTARY: $19k → 9%HORIZON ELEMENTARY: $16k → 9%DISCOVERY ELEMENTARY: $18k → 9%ORCHARD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: $16k → 10%HIGHLAND PARK ELEMENTARY: $12k → 9%CEDAR VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $13k → 9%SUQUAMISH ELEMENTARY: $17k → 10%HIGHLAND PARK ELEMENTARY: $10k → 9%CEDAR VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $11k → 9%SUQUAMISH ELEMENTARY: $10k → 10%FAIRMOUNT PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%CEDAR VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%HIGHLAND PARK ELEMENTARY: $9k → 9%ARMIN JAHR ELEMENTARY: $13k → 10%ARMIN JAHR ELEMENTARY: $11k → 10%HIGHLAND PARK ELEMENTARY: $8k → 9%ARMIN JAHR ELEMENTARY: $9k → 10%TALBOT HILL: $9k → 9%KIMBALL ELEMENTARY: $8k → 9%VIEW RIDGE ELEMENTARY: $10k → 9%VIEW RIDGE ELEMENTARY: $9k → 9%ROBERT EAGLE MIDDLE SCHOOL: $21k → 9%WEST SEATTLE ELEMENTARY: $12k → 9%WEST SEATTLE ELEMENTARY: $12k → 9%WEST SEATTLE ELEMENTARY: $9k → 9%DEARBORN PARK ELEMENTARY: $10k → 9%ROXHILL ELEMENTARY: $8k → 9%CONCORD INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $9k → 9%SARTORI ELEMENTARY: $13k → 9%CONCORD INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $9k → 9%SARTORI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $10k → 9%DEARBORN PARK ELEMENTARY: $9k → 9%SARTORI ELEMENTARY: $10k → 9%TOTEM ELEMENTARY: $28k → 9%DEARBORN PARK ELEMENTARY: $8k → 9%RISING STAR ELEMENTARY: $10k → 9%GRAHAM HILL ELEMENTARY: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$830k · 11 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$830k
$23k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    Seattle Public Schools
    8× · 2017–2025 · $436k
  • BS
    BREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
    4× · 2017–2020 · $84k
  • MS
    MUKILTEO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 6
    2× · 2017–2018 · $52k

Funded once

  • SK
    SOUTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $16k
  • LQ
    LAKE QUINAULT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Seattle Public Schools: $435,855 · OtherSeattle Public SchoolsBREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $83,995 · OtherBREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICTMUKILTEO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 6: $52,380 · OtherMUKILTEO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 6RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403: $41,775 · OtherEDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $39,960 · OtherFederal Way Public Schools: $38,950 · OtherSUQUAMISH ELEMENTARY: $34,075 · OtherLIBERTY ELEMENTARY: $29,545 · Other+5 more: $96,570 · Other+5 moreSEATTLE NATIVITY SCHOOL: $6,270 · Education
Other$853,105Education$6,270

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEATTLE NATIVITY SCHOOL: $6,270 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE NATIVITY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Page Ahead Childrens Literacy PrgmWA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Page Ahead Childrens Literacy Prgm · Invested · Washington First Robotics · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · School's Out Washington · GenYOUTH Incorporated · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Washington Music Educators Association · Kidvantage · Naturebridge · Building Changes · Gates Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Islandwood funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Islandwood. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $226k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Islandwood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph