· Private foundation
Isadore & Yetta Joshowitz Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k76 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GTR PGH | $60,500 |
| KOLLEL BAIS YITZCHOK (KOLLEL JEWISH LEARNING CENTER) | $16,000 |
| HILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH | $11,950 |
| MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| YESHIVA SCHOOLS | $5,000 |
| CONGREGATION POALE ZEDECK | $2,600 |
| BANOT SHERUT OF PITTSBURGH | $2,500 |
| PADRES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| SHAARE TORAH | $2,000 |
| YOUNG ISREAL OF PITTSBURGH | $2,000 |
| YESHIVA UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| CAMP STONE | $2,000 |
| HILLEL INTERNATIONAL | $1,700 |
| YESIVA NACHLEI TORAH | $1,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
90 repeat relationships: 69 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- HAHILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH5× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +14%
- YUYESHIVA UNIVERSITY5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +25%
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- JFJOSHOWITZ FAMILY FUND GEMILAS CHESEDone grant, 2021 · $20k
- GCGEMILAS CHESSED JOSHOWTIZ FAMILY FUNDone grant, 2022 · $12k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…
Religious School
How this is measured
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HILLEL ACADEMY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds YESHIVATH ACHEI TMIMIM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds PARDES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Braddock Carnegie Library Assoc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds Pittsburgh Kollel Bais Yitzchok ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NACHLAS ZVI ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Tzedakah Foundation · David S Shapira Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Morris Charles M Tr Ua-Char · The Fine Foundation · Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Fourteen Ten Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Isadore & Yetta Joshowitz Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Isadore & Yetta Joshowitz Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
- Kollel of Greater Boston Inc: 4% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Isadore & Yetta Joshowitz’s filings →