· Private foundation
Irving S Johnson and Alwyn N Johnson Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $425k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Episcopal Relief and Development | $42,000 |
| Doctors Without Borders USA | $32,000 |
| HOME Inc | $13,000 |
| Fish of Sanibel-Captiva Inc | $12,000 |
| Heart to Heart International | $11,000 |
| Abolitionist Law Center | $11,000 |
| National Immigration Law Center | $11,000 |
| Equal Justice Initiative | $11,000 |
| Southern Poverty Law Center | $11,000 |
| Arc of Benton Co | $10,500 |
| Jameson Camp | $10,000 |
| Global Greengrants Fund | $10,000 |
| Island Health and Wellness Foundation | $10,000 |
| Native American Heritage Association | $10,000 |
| Happy Hollow Childrens Camp | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
73 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EREPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT9× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +17%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +98%- FSFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +107%
Funded once
- HOHOME OPPORTUNITIES MADE EASY INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +53%
- TRThe Regional Advisory Council of Benton Countyone grant, 2022 · $5k
- SRSpruce Run Associationone grant, 2017 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ABUSE COUNSELING & TREATMENT INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JAMESON INC ↗
- Who funds HOME INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE TREEHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds IYG INC ↗
- Who funds Native American Heritage Association ↗
- Who funds Maine Center for Coastal Fisheries ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HEALTH & WELLNESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL AMBULANCE CORPS ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ABOLITIONIST LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPERA HOUSE ARTS ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS OF WESTERN QUEENS INC ↗
- Who funds HAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN P CRAINE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WAYCROSS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR THE SILENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Second Helpings Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Pacers Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Salesforce Foundation · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Irving S Johnson and Alwyn N Johnson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- National Consumer Law Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- The United Way of Lee County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.