Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Irving Gilman Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2020
12
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$216k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Irving Gilman Family Charitable Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
17
6
18
6
19
6
20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Philanthropy$272kHealth$27kArts & Culture$12kFood & Nutrition$4kInternational$4kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k11 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $216k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST$216,223
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HARTFORD$9,000
HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING$5,000
PROGRESS HOUSE$3,500
CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER FOUNDATION$2,500
THEATERWORKS$2,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$1,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$1,000
MAZON$1,000
LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROGRESS HOUSE: $4k → 8%MAZON: $1k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $1k → 17%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES: $500 → 11%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%PROGRESS HOUSE: $4k → 8%MAZON: $1k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $1k → 17%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES: $500 → 11%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%PROGRESS HOUSE: $3k → 8%MAZON: $1k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $1k → 17%CONNECTICUT PUBLIC TELEVISION: $500 → 11%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%PROGRESS HOUSE: $3k → 8%MAZON: $1k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $1k → 17%CONNECTICUT PUBLIC TELEVISION: $500 → 11%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $1k → 17%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES: $500 → 11%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $1k → 17%CONNECTICUT PUBLIC TELEVISION: $500 → 11%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $1k → 17%CONNECTICUT PUBLIC TELEVISION: $500 → 11%THE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $1k → 17%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES: $500 → 11%MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST: $216k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $9k → 11%THEATERWORKS: $3k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $9k → 11%THEATERWORKS: $2k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $9k → 11%THEATERWORKS: $2k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $9k → 11%THEATERWORKS: $2k → 11%HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $5k → 11%HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $5k → 11%HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $5k → 11%HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$47k · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$47k
$0

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PROGRESS HOUSE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue +65%
  • CH
    Christian Health Care Center Foundation
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +76%
  • TI
    THEATERWORKS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +8%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Hebrew Health Care Foundation Inc

    Managing endowment funds for hebrew health care and affiliates.

    2
    Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

    Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

    Health
    3
    Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

    The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

    Health
    4
    Hebrew Home & Hospital

    The mission of hebrew home and hospital aligns with the mission of its parent organization, hebrew health care, to provide quality services to senior adults. (see schedule o)as part of an integrated system to assist seniors in the…

    Health
    5
    America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

    Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

    Membership Benefit
    6
    Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Inc

    The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group is to put patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, and exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

    Health
    7
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    8
    Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

    The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

    Education
    9
    Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

    See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

    Philanthropy
    10
    Health Care Without Harm

    The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

    Environment
    11
    Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

    Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

    Health
    12
    University of Illinois Foundation

    The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Hartford Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mazon a Jewish Response to Hunger. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    9/10
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $216,223 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HARTFORD INC — $36,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HARTFORD INCHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING — $20,000 · PhilanthropyHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVINGChristian Health Care Center Foundation — $10,000 · PhilanthropyPROGRESS HOUSE INC — $13,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 · HealthTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA — $4,000 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherTHEATERWORKS INC — $8,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $4,000 · InternationalLoaves and Fishes Ministries Inc — $2,000 · Religion
    Philanthropy$282,223Health$17,000Other$10,000Arts & Culture$8,000International$4,000Religion$2,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $216,223 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER HARTFORD INC — $36,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROGRESS HOUSE INC — $13,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetChristian Health Care Center Foundation — $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHEATERWORKS INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLoaves and Fishes Ministries Inc — $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Irving Gilman Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
    • Theaterworks Inc3% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph